I was repeating a comment I read and I said exactly that. I didn't take the time to verify it. If it bothers you so damn much, why don't you disprove it? Surely your employers at the DNC or some Soros front group can handle such a simple task. This is the last time I respond to you, troll, so don't waste your time stalking me.
Scumbag Senator Al Franken was elected due to vote fraud in Minnesota. A combination of republican timidity and democrat facilitation resulted in the Senate seat that was crucial to obamacare being stolen. Dems however are still incensed by republicans thwarting their attempt to steal the 2000 presidential election. " In the '08 campaign, Republican Sen. Norm Coleman was running for re-election against Democrat Al Franken. It was impossibly close...After the first canvass, Coleman's lead was down to 206 votes. That was followed by months of wrangling and litigation. In the end, Franken was declared the winner by 312 votes. He was sworn into office in July 2009, eight months after the election. During the controversy a conservative group called Minnesota Majority began to look into claims of voter fraud. Comparing criminal records with voting rolls, the group identified 1,099 felons -- all ineligible to vote -- who had voted in the Franken-Coleman race. Minnesota Majority took the information to prosecutors across the state, many of whom showed no interest in pursuing it. But Minnesota law requires authorities to investigate such leads. And so far, Fund and von Spakovsky report, 177 people have been convicted -- not just accused, but convicted -- of voting fraudulently in the Senate race. Another 66 are awaiting trial. "The numbers aren't greater," the authors say, "because the standard for convicting someone of voter fraud in Minnesota is that they must have been both ineligible, and 'knowingly' voted unlawfully." The accused can get off by claiming not to have known they did anything wrong. Still, that's a total of 243 people either convicted of voter fraud or awaiting trial in an election that was decided by 312 votes. With 1,099 examples identified by Minnesota Majority, and with evidence suggesting that felons, when they do vote, strongly favor Democrats, it doesn't require a leap to suggest there might one day be proof that Al Franken was elected on the strength of voter fraud." http://townhall.com/columnists/john..._show_voter_fraud_is_a_huge_problem/page/full#!
It has got to be massive, else spending money to eradicate it is negative ROI. A waste, like spending money on expanded voting hours.
*Yawn* http://www.alternet.org/gop-voter-fraud-hucksters-latest-lie-felons-made-franken-us-senator http://mediamatters.org/research/2010/07/13/conservative-media-hype-not-accurate-report-to/185985
Wow, following AAA from thread to thread, that have nothing to do with your topic, and continually trying to troll him, seems like some things never change with you.
Following? No. I was already in this thread when AAA subsequently wrote a ridiculous post. Since he still didn't answer for a previous ridiculous post I called him out on in another thread, I pointed it out for his convenience. Like you, AAA is like a pigeon that just shits wherever it goes. I would just like for him to clean up after himself. You wouldn't understand. But I do understand why you would try to defend someone who makes bogus claims and generally posts nonsense.