I have no problem with looking back at any of it. It’s tough to get all of crimes and criminals in Trumpworld right but there certainly are a lot of them.[/QUOTE] Right. Its all about me having no evidence while you continue to point out Trump criminals with...wait for it...no evidence. This isn't at all what I said.
We hold to the Scientific Method, and continue to point out the narratives by the people vested in those narratives. Eventually the facts will come out and we can throw it in their face. They don't think in terms of the long game. They only go from crisis to crisis.
Right. Its all about me having no evidence while you continue to point out Trump criminals with...wait for it...no evidence. This isn't at all what I said.[/QUOTE] There are 8 Trump associates from either his campaign or his transition team that have either been convicted of a felony or plead guilty to a felony related to the work they did on his campaign, in relation to his campaign or with his transition. Trump himself was forced to dissolve his “charity“ and he and his children are barred from working in or starting a charity in NY state. Trump is “individual 1” in the same indictment that Cohen was convicted for. There is currently an open investigation into selling pardons. What are you looking for in terms of evidence? The sentencing documents, the redacted complaints? This isn’t difficult, Donald Trump is a crook and so are his friends and family.
Ah, you almost had it. You could have gone with everything up until the last sentence and you'd have had a point. Then you went with Donald Trump is a crook, and proved the whole thing I was saying. You'll make a claim like that without evidence that the man has committed any crime. And that's fine. You can believe what you want. I'm not so sure I don't believe it myself. But there's no evidence of a crime committed. You then turn around and say "you have no evidence that COVID cases were misrepresented" (I paraphrased to what I am claiming) so its automatically false. You're a treasure trove of self contradictions and blind partisanship.
one man is to blame. that one man has you using “statistics” to justify a belief that our democratic process doesn’t work. under any other president, Republican or democrat, this wouldn’t have been a political issue.
For the indictment, it’s hard to say. An ex-President isn’t an everyday citizen. If he was just a regular guy, no doubt he would have been charged. Then there are also pardons yet to come and the open question of if Trump will pardon himself - which I have to say I do think will be held as legal if he does.
When - and if - this day comes, you will be vindicated. Until then, you aren't. You have a claim. Just as I do on the topic of this thread.
No. My claim is Trump is a crook. That is valid. He is guilty of misuse of charitable funds. This is a fact. He is also guilty of fraud with Trump university. Trump is a crook.