No, you're trying change the subject because you can't explain how "American consumers were at the center of the storm" equates to "Harper blamed US consumers for nothing" as you said it does. But I do think you need a guru like Jack Hershey, now that you brought him up.
No, I don't change the subject. I think you got it as I already answered your question in the previous post that you share the same idea as Harper but for different purpose.
If you call that an answer it explains a lot... why you did so poorly in school and why you still lack critical thinking skills. As I told you (before you tried to steal the line from me, even though you claim you don't understand it) go hump someone else's leg.
You're just telling us your own story indeed. Now my question is, did you share the same idea as Harper or not? If no, then I have nothing to say and sorry for my misunderstanding. If yes, then I already answered to your question and it's up to you to understand it correctly.
What part of this don't you understand? http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2349687#post2349687 I said NOTHING about Harper's political motives for saying it. Go argue that with someone else who wants to discuss it. Which is what I meant by telling you to hump someone else's leg.
You are exactly correct. The American consumer was caught in the crossfire but Harper's real intent there was to bash the Liberal's and prop up the Conservatives.