What worse things that Trump has done? LOL Oh yes, trying to balance the trade with a country that ran the biggest trade deficit against the US, yes very bad. And then there is urging other NATO countries to contribute more to at least meet the agreed upon minimum spending target, yes that's very bad. And then there is creating economic opportunities for African Americans and increasing investments permanently in historically black colleges, yeah worst thing of all. And that is on top of growing strong economy. Yeah all bad things. Woke Biden is the best and the fake woke Kamala would be better. LOL Got it!
What do you mean claim back California? California already IS Mexico. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/CA/PST045224 40% Latino with 77% being Mexican. LOL
Yup the dems approach the elites for $$ and go to illegals for votes. Ingenious system that the dems set up. LOL
With some states like Florida where 45% of the houses belong to an HOA, that "free will" choice is quite limited. True you do not choose where you are born but you do have the free will to leave. You are so smart you didn't think of that? LOL Bottom line, HOA is a dictatorship. If Saddam Hussein and Qaddafi couldn't exist, neither should HOA if you want USA to be truly the land of the free. Whether somebody has the will to choose is irrelevant. That's all I am saying.
MAGA's tooo dumb to understand taking or cough cough threatening buying or else is not ... a purchase.
Land of the free cry me HOA river. Get fatRrump to change it. He lives in a Florida Private Club lol.
North Korea is ONE of the perhaps few exceptions. HOA is still a dictatorship that America that's the land of the free shouldn't allow to exist.
Duhhhhh no Male Karen. They chose to live in a HOA community. If they didn't choose to, they would chose to live instead in one of the of remaining 55% of homes. Its not like, gee I can't find a non-HOA home in Boca so let me look in your neck of the woods - Bumfack, Alabama.
This is a nice example of how imprecise use of the language may mislead, however inadvertently. Someone not very familiar with the U.S. Constitution, and having read your post, might be forgiven for thinking those responsibly for our U.S. Constitution were idiots. (They may have been, but there is nothing in the Constitution, so far as I am aware, that would reveal that.) I am certain you meant to write, "The U.S. Constitution does not specifically disallow a felon from being elected president or serving as such." The Constitution is silent on this matter, most likely because by June 21st, 1788 no one had thought to consider the possibility that the fledgling-country-to-be would ever elect as its president a person known to be a felon. In fact, until very recently, no one would have thought that was likely to happen. I suppose, now that it has happened, we may see, at some later date, efforts initiated to amend the Constitution to specifically disallow a felon who has not had their conviction pardoned to run for federal office. One thing we can all verify for ourselves is that nowhere in our Constitution is a criminally convicted felon specifically allowed to be president. Is it possible to respect a non-existent law? Probably not. Have you ever considered studying law? It would seem that in your case you reasoning would greatly profit from such.