Who views GWB-Trading threads? His overall contribution is a huge negative. One of these children may have found the cure for cancer but we never have it, because people like GWB-Trading destroyed the intellectual capital of the world. Its a disgrace what they did to children. New Data Show How the Pandemic Affected Learning Across Whole Communities
GWB should be prohibited from commenting (or cut and pasting) on global geopolitics because of "online harms" legislation. For example, after reading an article in support of Ukraine, i couldn't find my car keys for a half hour. He has a 50% chance of being right on any given topic, which is on par with a broken clock being right twice a day. So he should not be commenting on anything where people could actually get hurt. I suggest he only be allowed to chat on domestic issues like Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard. Or, for example, did Taylor Swift put an unknown football players name on the map? (I can't remember his name, oh yah, Travis Kelce). I think he should concentrate on the rumble between Caitlin Clark fans and the Democratic-DNC-BlackLivesMatter front organization called the WNBA. He should only be allowed to make predictions about whether Clark will continue to be flagrantly fouled in 2025 until she bends the knee completely to the race hustlers, who will only be satisfied when Clark starts calling her fans racists who should be shamed into not buying tickets anymore, or charged extra for road tickets they might want to buy. This way, if he is wrong, nobody gets hurt.
...his posts are being viewed by you over and over again for starters...and more views equals more clicks equals more revenue for Baron....if quality of content mattered we would all be banned. It's quantity. seriously....I had to explain this? The fact that you went off on a tangent on some fantasy of what GWB did to children when we are talking about how a website makes revenue. Where did I put that crayon...
No they are not. It shows who the last poster was and I do not respond or even read them for that matter. You are incorrect, Kamala.