that's a good point, a few people here don't use aliases and some don't want to be associated in being part of a "racist online board"
how ironic. every post u make has anti white undertones and is racist. u are joking right? my posts are factual and reactionary. the mug shot was a gangbanger who was killed and then shooting erupted at his funeral. the other picture showed him ( a dad in name only) and at a very young age with his baby. what kind of life will that innocent baby have?? its sad. that post was not racist it was an example of " a certain aspect" of black culture.
What I don't like is racist blanket statements. For example. the last person I banned from this forum for racial hatred said the following statement repeatedly over and over again: "The vast majority of white-collar crimes in the U.S. are committed by Jews." I asked him repeatedly to back up that statement with a single credible and verifiable source. He could not do that, so I banned him with the caveat that if he could find a credible statistic source to back up his statement, I would let him back. Of course, he has been unable to produce anything whatsoever in the past year or two since he's been gone. The other irritating thing he did was post new threads containing his exact same anti-Semitic opinion daily. Again, that's not necessary. It's just annoying. So... In summary, this is the framework we are working with here: Don't make blanket statements that can neither be verified or even believed by pretty much anyone. Don't repeat yourself frequently with multiple new threads essentially expressing the exact same racist opinion. We heard you the first 10 times. Don't make your post history here look like you are only here to talk about one racist subject. People on soapboxes, regardless of the subject matter, are extremely irritating and disruptive. There are other conditions and situations that can get a person banned, but violating the three above will guarantee that a person gets the boot swiftly and without warning.
If one had to pick out three posters who best capture the essence of this forum at the moment, it's S2007S, Jem, and Corky5. Not sure that any of them will help you trade well, deal with the virus well, or in Corky's case foster good race relations. And opposing their opinions may be a complete waste of time no matter how absurd or illogical their ideas can get. So I guess it's on us to make better use of our time.
The people calling for corky to be banned, helllooooo mclfly there is an ignore feature.. use it. Presto, he's banned! And come on guys, really get a life. You're calling for someone to be banned on a politics forum of a trading website. This is the miscellaneous section of ET, the junk drawer lol. Sheesh!
It looks like exthinker is busy all of the internet. Exthinker is apparently admitting to getting paid to troll. Rearender, heretowasteaway, and tonylovesoligarchs are apparently too dumb to get paid and are simply useful idiots. @exGOPer, so how much do you get paid monthly? How long is your contract? What are the requirements in your contract?
I'm am deeply offended because you did not include me on that list. Bust out the banhammer for rearender!
the problem w/that Baron, is the trolls you've already banned (like Corky) just come back and make empty posts in other sections to make it seem like they're following the rules of not being here just for inflammatory racist posts. I'm sure said rules were communicated to him before his last ban so it's easy to skirt them.