Can It Be This Simple? S&P 500

Discussion in 'Index Futures' started by systematictrader, Jan 26, 2017.


  1. good advice
     
    #21     Jan 26, 2017

  2. i heard the percentage is that 80% or so underperform
     
    #22     Jan 26, 2017
  3. i agree specially in investing, not saying this is the holy grail, but in investments (which is consider different than trading) it could be very simple

    just look at Jim Rogers
     
    #23     Jan 26, 2017
  4. drcha

    drcha

    He doesn't need to outdo Wall Street--only to match them with less volatility, which is the same thing as beating them when you consider compounded returns.
     
    #24     Jan 26, 2017
  5. lol
     
    #25     Jan 26, 2017
  6. Zzzz1

    Zzzz1

    You are joking right?

     
    #26     Jan 26, 2017
  7. Over the last 5-year period, 80.8% underperformed the S&P 500. Over the last 10-year period, 79.59% of active managers underperformed. These types of figures are very similar in other asset classes like small cap stocks and foreign stocks.

    Read more: How many mutual funds beat the S&P 500 on a percentage basis after operational fees? | Investopedia http://www.investopedia.com/advisor...e-basis-after-operational-fees/#ixzz4WvEGUhrb
    Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook
     
    #27     Jan 26, 2017
  8. Zzzz1

    Zzzz1

    I am talking about institutional traders at ibanks. Big difference.

     
    #28     Jan 26, 2017
    systematictrader likes this.
  9. oh, iam not sure why were talking about them to begin with, were talking about sp500 n this,,,

    by the way totally unrelated to this i wanted to thank u on ur advice in other post regarding hiring someone to code for back testing, its working so far good
     
    #29     Jan 26, 2017
  10. Pekelo

    Pekelo

    So if most outperforms the market, why HFs don't hire them and let them just trade?
     
    #30     Jan 26, 2017