Mr Magandre, First this thread is not for discussion about my service, it is you who want to start all this. You think you deserve all the hourly updates that my paying members get without you paying ???? For all those members who do not know how to use my forecasts : To every member who seeks more information how to use the forecasts, I tell clearly few things : 1. Times can be off 15-20 min 2.Opening 15-20 min and closing 1/2 hour is likely to be unreliable as I do not have enough data points around those time frames. 3. My forecasts are directional and no price projection 4. So amplitudes of some signals may vary, means they can go down more or less than shown or go UP more or less than shown. 5. I advise caution in taking trades when signals are for short duration.. and few more things to better use it.... It is my prerogative to decide when to update and not to update... My members get latest information that I se and feel like communicating... (but I want to avoid all conversation about my service... so let's concentrate on strategy and how forecast can improve the results)
abhay, I am trying your free trial right now. Are you saying that paying members received your updated forecast (posted here), while trial members did not? If so, you should have said that in the first place, because now your credibility is in quesiton. Your posts addressing this issue are disturbing. You may not want to discuss your service on this thread, but since you promote it by posting your forecasts and providing the link in your profile (and pointing people to the profile with your signature line), you need to address these issues. As I said before, I defended you on the other thread. But, you are causing major problems for yourself here, especially in how you are addressing the concerns.
New, All discussions abut my service apart, I am not asking anyone here to take my service. Why can't you folks simply understand that this thread is about seeking help on building a strategy and testing the results. Since the morning bias was same in both the forecasts I did not even think twice about chart looking little different in second session. My focus on this strategy is purely in morning session as I have said repeatedly in my parameters, One trade from morning and I will be done using this strategy... and all my previous forecasts are showing a very high corelation to morning bias and trend... I am happy to make money trading myself alone...
This is my last post on the subject. But, stop saying you are not promoting your service. You post your forecast, you talk about your archive in your signature line, you point people to your profile, and your profile has a link to your site. I gave you every chance to address my concerns about the multiple forecasts. I also asked you a direct question which you did not answer - did you send the revised forecast posted here to your subscribers? I know you did not send it to the trial members, as I am taking the trial now. I am very disappointed. I do not care if you are wrong, but I care about how you address this issue and how you are trying to deflect the questions and concerns which are very valid.
I will not answer any question about my service on this forum. Link is provided because there is a place to put that, I don't know why else that field was included in creating your profile... I think I can still discuss my forecasts and their utility without discussing my service ... The obvious questions will always be how to believe or rely on them, for that purpose and to avoid 1000 posts, it is said if you have doubts or want to verify then the past forecasts are in the archive...
I never understood how astrological events effected prices on a financial index. Reasons for people buying and selling and their moods, emotions and feelings could not be significantly controlled by these events. The original post wast interesting to me.....and I participated in this thread for the statistical value of the thread.....not the writer. No dis-respect intended, but now that all this credibility investigation and the methodology I discovered that Abhay represents....I in know way agree with and not a part of. sorry abhay....but your statistical observations and tests "about the original post to this thread", that you opened with is still very interesting to me. But I cannot condone your attitude and metyhodology represented here and elsewhere. Michael B.
I haver the signiture lines ignored in ET, even though I have one. Also, i do not click on a name of every poster to see if they have a website. This was news to me..... Michael B.
You are a classic scammer. You are caught in a lie, and your response is "I will not answer any question about my service on this forum". What a way out - kind of like, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman...". You were asked a straightforward question by newtoet - your unwillingness to respond puts the nail in the coffin.
Putting all the distractions aside, I am still interested in the results of the above strategy... I am working on it too, but having some problems in the code...