California high court upholds gay marriage ban but allows existing same-sex marriages to stand. May 26 01:03 PM US/Eastern SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - California high court upholds gay marriage ban but allows existing same-sex marriages to stand. Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98E21HG1&show_article=1
Print Back to story California high court upholds gay marriage ban By LISA LEFF, Associated Press Writer Lisa Leff, Associated Press Writer 24 mins ago SAN FRANCISCO â The California Supreme Court upheld a voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage Tuesday, but it also decided that the estimated 18,000 gay couples who tied the knot before the law took effect will stay wed. The 6-1 decision written by Chief Justice Ron George rejected an argument by gay rights activists that the ban revised the California constitution's equal protection clause to such a dramatic degree that it first needed the Legislature's approval. The court said the people have a right, through the ballot box, to change their constitution. "In a sense, petitioners' and the attorney general's complaint is that it is just too easy to amend the California constitution through the initiative process. But it is not a proper function of this court to curtail that process; we are constitutionally bound to uphold it," the ruling said. The announcement of the decision set off an outcry among a sea of demonstrators who had gathered in front of the San Francisco courthouse awaiting the ruling. Holding signs and many waving rainbow flags, they chanted "shame on you." Many people also held hands in a chain around an intersection in an act of protest. Gay rights activists immediately promised to resume their fight, saying they would go back to voters as early as next year in a bid to repeal Proposition 8. The split decision provided some relief for the 18,000 gay couples who married in the brief time same-sex marriage was legal last year but that wasn't enough to dull the anger over the ruling that banned gay marriage. "It's not about whether we get to stay married. Our fight is far from over," said Jeannie Rizzo, 62, who was one of the lead plaintiffs along with her wife, Polly Cooper. "I have about 20 years left on this earth, and I'm going to continue to fight for equality every day." The state Supreme Court had ruled last May that it was unconstitutional to deny gay couples the right to wed. Many same-sex couples had rushed to get married before the November vote on Proposition 8, fearing it could be passed. When it was, gay rights activists went back to the court arguing that the ban was improperly put to voters. That was the issue justices decided Tuesday. "After comparing this initiative measure to the many other constitutional changes that have been reviewed and evaluated in numerous prior decisions of this court, we conclude Proposition 8 constitutes a constitutional amendment rather than a constitutional revision," the ruling said.
Already got the email - The San Diego Democratic Club is planning a march today at 5PM to the Hall of Justice. I don't do protests/marches so I won't be participating, but I wonder how many they will get. There were so many marches after the election people got "protest fatigue" and stopped showing up. The energy would be better spent on getting a proposition on the ballot to overturn 8. Prop 8 was well worded and is airtight, no amount of protests and marches will help. The only thing that will help is another proposition.
The California Supreme Court agreed with the voters of California and Carrie Prejean. Militant homosexual Perez Hilton must be on suicide watch.
Perez Hilton.. oh yeah, I'd forgotten that jerk. What a rude, overbearing little prick that assclown is... He can go back to worrying about his blood cell counts for awhile, politically this thing is over for awhile...
This really was a good day for democracy and the concept that the majority should rule unless important constitutional rights of real minorities are infringed. You wish to change the definition of marriage. Vote for it. If you win the vote, you deserve it.
Well that is the rub isn't it? i personally don't like gay marriage, but it is nothing more than big government for us to deny them the right. which is ok with me, its just funny because usually the people that are against gay marriage are also against big government, when a gay marriage ban is a prefect example of big gov.