Bye-bye reg T

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by just21, Oct 16, 2006.

  1. mskl

    mskl


    Perhaps there still are some minor advantages to having a JBO - but they are minor (ie. my margin requirement just fell about 94 %)

    Should be fun............
     
    #191     Mar 30, 2007
  2. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    How did your margin requirement fall 94%???? Please cite your example. You can't reduce your margins by 94% in any account. You are not blowing hot air are you?
     
    #192     Mar 30, 2007
  3. Has anyone had any luck with IB's portfolio margin demo? It is very flakey (the market data is coming and going). Or maybe it's because there are 20000 people trying to use it now.
     
    #193     Mar 30, 2007
  4. mskl

    mskl


    LOL - you're pretty funny:

    Here it is:

    In one of my accounts I mainly have Conversions/Reconversions.

    My current Reg-T margin requirement is over $350 K. With Portfolio Margin - I will be charged the minimum per option contract (about 600 options X 37.50) or $22,250 - no direction risk or volatility risk

    A Micro Example:

    Long 1,000 shares of IBM at $104

    Short 10 APR $100 Calls
    Long 10 APR $100 Puts

    Under Reg-t - My Margin requirement would be $52,000. Under Portfolio Margin the requirement would be the minimum or $750 (20 contacts x $37.50) a decrease of almost 99%
     
    #194     Mar 30, 2007
  5. mskl

    mskl

    yes - it worked for me. But I tried it a couple of hours ago.
     
    #195     Mar 30, 2007
  6. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I seriously doubt you are trading conversions and reversals off the floor for negative edge. And the con/rev is not a position per se. I'm not trying to be a dick, but I'm not buying this. LOL.
     
    #196     Mar 30, 2007
  7. mskl

    mskl

    too funny....

    I've been doing it for years - I track the entire options market but mainly only do conversions on the front month. In many cases (high priced stocks) I have not been able to compete as my ROE would be so low because of Reg-T - now a conversion in GOOG will cost me the same as a conversion in a $5 stock.

    But whatever......

    It's nice to have doubters.....

    Later, gotta put the kids to bed.
     
    #197     Mar 30, 2007
  8. So for pure intraday stock trading, based on the IB demo, looks like ur buying power goes to around 7x instead of the current 4x for taking individual stock positions. Also it does not take into account if you are say long QCOM and short QQQQ, no reduction in margin requirements for that type of hedge it seems.... i wonder why
     
    #198     Mar 30, 2007
  9. Maverick74

    Maverick74

    I found this statement by IB curious.

    "Of course for some accounts with risky positions, Portfolio Margin can require more margin than under Reg T. That’s the point of Portfolio Margin, for margin requirements to more accurately reflect the actual risk of the positions in an account. It should be noted that for customers with highly concentrated accounts, Portfolio Margin may calculate higher margin requirements under Reg T. Portfolio Margin must assess proportionately larger margin for accounts whose positions are concentrated in a relatively small number of stocks."
     
    #199     Mar 30, 2007
  10. nitro

    nitro

    :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

    Can you explain the "sort of" part?

    nitro
     
    #200     Mar 31, 2007