you gotta be kidding, I have never heard such horse manure before. You are either pulling this story out of your arse or you must have met the most naive and dumb guys in the whole funding universe. Every other guy in professional finance has your qualifications or better. Plus your performance story really does not sound at all credible let alone you have nothing whatsoever to back it up. To get the funding you indicated you must have either been increadibly lucky or bullshitted yourself the whole nine yards through this. Don't get me wrong I am not jealous, just amazed about either what stories people invent or how dumb money there really is still out there, particularly in those times. Oh, before I forget, what is your actual point here and where are you trying to get to with this thread? I must have gotten lost somewhere...
Would you buy a used car from this man? Or a ripped-off Wealth-Lab hack? <img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_xQnqbPVccqo/Sd1pMZ6v_8I/AAAAAAAAAAc/CNqqkxH93es/S220/Beau%2BWolinsky.JPG"/>
Come on now, ain't you people come here on ET to be entertained? Why don't we let this virtual office clown do his thing now and we just sit quietly and watch. You know, sorta like in a zoo.
Wonder what he's using to secure the loan. Because as a commercial loan guy, my experience is that hard money guys are gonna want full recourse, with an exorbitant interest rate, for which is more often than not an interest only loan with a term that usually doesn't go above 2 years. In other words, hard money/venture capital is also considered to be bridge financing. For which the individual applying needs to show a reasonable path to the other side of the bridge within the term of the loan. Does anyone else feel like this is an outtake scene from Napoleon Dynamite?
That's a good one. No, naming a system does usually require some credit to either where it comes from or to the idea behind it. In this case that is what Scottd had called it.