That is not how it works in the rust belt. If anything, someone from Ohio might cost votes in Michigan. Vance was a terrible pick because Trump was already going to win Ohio. He would have won by more than last time without Vance. To me, they clearly made the Vance pick when they thought they had the election in the bag and they did against Biden. Not picking someone who can deliver an actual battleground state was a huge error. PA is a problem now because Harris is going to get younger people in the population centers to vote who would have just stayed home with Biden. Michigan is already lost for the same reason. That is why Harris is not going to pick Whitmer, they already have MI. This is a complete disaster because Harris isn't going to have enough time to mess up like she would have in a real campaign.
That couch is the same color as this one. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/mans-best-friend-thread.300940/page-31#post-5995326 But if Muttley dirtied it up and chased her off... pound bound for Muttley.
J.D. Vance personally, I did not like. Remember this guy did not even like Trump before. People can change their minds but, he looks too much like an establishment candidate to me. Burghum also, said negative things about Trump. Also, looked like an establishment candidate. Whoever, picked the VP choices should have been taken to the woodshed and given a beating. Elise Stepanik would have been a good choice or even Kristi Noem. Even Kari Lake probably, would have been an excellent choice. I would think the donor class might have had a huge influence on it. However, if you are choosing the VP which could replace the US President if needed, in an emergency, you would pick the best one for the job. It is probably, too late to replace him.