But it's the women who are emotional and compulsive

As opposed to supporting the tyranny of square miles?

 

As opposed to supporting the tyranny of the cities -- where everyone not in the city becomes their peasants.

 

If they had the screw everyone else attitude, they won't be feeding the rural red states who act ungrateful for being fed.

 

You call it tyranny, I call it will of the people - you know, what democracies are based upon.

 

Red states can feed themselves. Thank you.

Where inside the cities are the crops grown?

 

I stand for people,not areas.Thought that was clear.

 

You believe that the people from a small number of counties which represent 64% of the American GDP should tyrannize everyone else. We already established that. You can't walk it back now.

 

So cities should be grateful for crops subsidized by them?

 

How exactly are they tyrannizing?

Majority will of the people should be ignored for the minority?

 

Time for you to go read your history of the founding fathers to figure this out.