Chipotle needds workers in the restaurants to sell and service the customers otherwise those executives who sit in an office all day have nothing to do or will be out of a job
Bonuses and incentives are subject to considerable manipulation for personal gain, an option not available to the lower-level employee. It is no secret that some companies continue to exist not because of but in spite of the people at or near the top. Liabilities at the bottom get ousted quickly; at the top, not quite as efficiently.
Maybe we should require employers of barristers in uppity coffee shops like Starbucks be required to buy their employees overpriced electric cars --- so the employees can represent the standards of their employer by showing off their snotty attitude while cruising around town. Of course, Dunkin Donuts can go buy their employees diesel trucks in response.
Hey, I don't think playing grab-ass counts for nothing. I know we're overstating it. But not as much as AR15 seems to think.
I suppose there is some truth in that. But which side tries to look after the interests of the lower and lowest rung in the hierarchy?