I assume you mean "something substantially BETTER than personal attacks?" http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1878313#post1878313 There's my "substance". BTW it's doesn't look good when your grammatically challenged and clueless either.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1879957#post1879957 Some more "substantially BETTER than personal attacks" for HFT2.
The SONG ------ *** "If your LONG your WRONG" *** They got you "all-in" - it aint gonna be a win You were conned to be LONG - your not liking this song You took the CNBC bait - it was all against your fate As you begged for the breakout - broker slammed you with a margin call shake out Your were trapped in your LOSING positions - remember it was always from YOUR decisions The globalist's are laughing at you - they punked your ass and its not new You were always SO RIGHT - as the dollars in your account took flight Your on your last grand - makin your ET last stand!!!
Picking on grammar when everything else fails? Most losers on the Internet resort to this tactic which is actually an admission of inferiority, and a lack of ability to intellectually transmit few lines.
More proof that we don't need to bring back the uptick rule. Sounds like the deck is totally stacked against short sellers, which begs the question: Why are you and so many others so fired up about traders who sell short? And would you be as equally critical of profit takers who drive down a stock's PPS? Still waiting to see the uptick critics answer that question.
The FED has not stepped in and bought S and P futures NEVER. That is a total lie from those that say they did.