Brokeback Mountain

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Ricter, Mar 1, 2006.

I pick #7.

  1. Saw it, loved it.

    8 vote(s)
    9.2%
  2. Saw it, shrug.

    8 vote(s)
    9.2%
  3. Saw it, blech.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Started it, walked out.

    1 vote(s)
    1.1%
  5. Want to see it.

    5 vote(s)
    5.7%
  6. Don't care if I see it or not.

    23 vote(s)
    26.4%
  7. Will never see it, ever.

    38 vote(s)
    43.7%
  8. I wanna be a cowboy!

    4 vote(s)
    4.6%
  1. Actually, you did: "I get my theories from Hollywood liberals".
     
    #91     Mar 10, 2006
  2. I wasn't asking you for a detailed report or anyting. I understand it's a difficult question to answer. That's why I provided you with the example. I'd be interested in hearing your answer to it.

    To remind you, whose rights should trump whose, according to your model: the gay's right to regale me with tales of his homosexual exploits, or could I have the right to tell him to stop (I mean, I could now, but I'd probably get fired for it)? Essentially, I want to know if forcing him to stop would be an assault on his dignity.
     
    #92     Mar 10, 2006
  3. Well, that's a simple enough question to answer. I thought you meant "dignity model" in the general sense of an integrated and tolerant society. As for your scenario, I would think that you would have every right, according to no rule other than good taste and common decency, to tell your boss to kindly keep his intimate personal life to himself. Hell, I don't want to hear about straight men's sexual exploits, let alone those of a gay man. Personal stuff is best left that way -- personal. In fact, the scenario you describe could conceivably be characterized as sexual harassment. While I don't think it's fair that gays should necessarily be stuffed into a dark closet, I sure as heck don't think they should have more privileges than anyone else has.
     
    #93     Mar 10, 2006
  4. I'm glad you feel that way. You'd be surprised how many people would consider that proto-homophobic.

    Of course, it's not just sexual exploits, there's just a sort of homosexual "innuendo" hanging in the air with the guy. Sort of like how feminists charge a "sexually charged workplace" thing. I want none of it.
     
    #94     Mar 11, 2006
  5. More than anything, this reveals the type of women you hang out with. What you describe is common among women who grew up in broken homes, with alcoholic parents, or were victims of sexual abuse. Behavior like this has much more to do with a woman's father than her husband.

    No, I think it has more to do with women remembering how to be women. :)

    Martin
     
    #95     Mar 13, 2006
  6. Discussion of sexual exploits, gay or straight, is never appropriate in a professional context. And requesting that someone refrain from discussing personal issues is always reasonable, in or out of the office.

    This is a question of basic etiquette. It is not a civil rights issue.

    Martin
     
    #96     Mar 13, 2006
  7. Spect8or, I'd like you to read the following lyrics, and <b>really think about them</b>, ok?

    Artist/Band: Ochs Phil
    Lyrics for Song: There But for Fortune
    Lyrics for Album: There But for Fortune

    Show me a prison, show me a jail
    Show me a pris'ner whose face has grown pale

    And I'll show you a young man
    With many reasons why
    There but for fortune, go you or I

    Show me an alley, show me a train
    Show me a hobo who sleeps out in the rain

    And I'll show you a young man
    With many reasons why
    'There but for fortune, go you or I

    Show me the whiskey stains on the floor
    Show me a drunk as he stumbles out the door

    And I'll show you a young man
    With many reasons why
    There but for fortune, go you or I

    Show me a country where the bombs had to fall
    Show me the ruins of buildings so tall

    And I'll show you a young land
    With many reasons why
    There but for fortune, go you or I
    You or I
    ________

    The moment people like you feel safely in the majority, you always try to 'clean up' those in the minority. This behavior is at the root of all the very worst atrocities ever perpetrated by mankind. Gay sex isn't right for your personal tastes, so you make every effort to shame, ostracize and isolate those who feel otherwise.
    Hard drug use doesn't interest you, so you enthusiastically imprison millions of your fellow men, just because their preferred recreational activities differ from your own. How about <b>live and let live</b> instead? Your way only leads to mass oppression and suffering.

    And no, I'm NOT saying that you should be sacrificing your body to the desires of homosexuals in the name of 'tolerance'. I'd rather eat a bullet than eat a dick myself. I'm just saying to respect the right of your fellow man to persue his own happiness however he sees fit. The victimless, recreational activities of consenting adults are none of your business, and <b>certainly</b> not the government's business either.
     
    #97     Mar 13, 2006
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    ^ excellent post.
     
    #98     Mar 13, 2006
  9. why is hump back mountain so popular? I didn't dislike it just didn't really impress me....the 2 cowboys? were following sheep around...where were the cows? 2 gay boys following sheep? what a scream..........
     
    #99     Mar 13, 2006
  10. Is it really so hard for you to imagine it becoming one?

    These days, seems like anything can become a "civil rights" issue, just as soon as the "victims" can drum up enough popular support for it.
     
    #100     Mar 14, 2006