Quite possible, I´ve had him on ignore for months, but remember he was flooding the forum with long posts
Starbucks Authority says: You must get jabbed or we're gonna fire you! So thousands do their bidding under threat of job loss. Oh, no, We at Starbucks were just kidding, never mind. Over time if side effects set in for some percent of unfortunates, eg. pericarditis, a Pfizer and CDC annotated side effect, will Lawyers get involved against Starbucks, who is NOT absolved of liability as is Pfizer et. al. Long Popcorn.
Personally I'd love to see some company AND THEIR CEO "POLICY MAKER" (Starbucks OK on this) get their ass reamed in court over "mandatory vaccine policy". SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS! Bottom Line... 1. Vaccines INEFFECTIVE at preventing infection 2. Vaccines INEFFECTIVE at preventing transmission to others 3. Vaccines damage the immune system of vaxxed Therefore... what the Hell is the rationale* behind requiring mandatory vaccination ?? *I get it... "can't help it... brainwashed... mass psychosis... incapable of thinking for myself". Hopefully there is an antidote.
Are you going to ream out the CEO for all the other vaccines their company requires? Or ream out the CEO for all the other safety measures they provide for workers which are not required by the government?
Probably not. The other vaccines do what they are supposed to, cause almost no side effects in an insignificant portion of the population, and weren't rushed through approval and made political. But you asked Scat. I'm just guessing those would be his answers.
25 yr Merrill advisor ain't havin no damn peanut buttah! Peanut allergy rate of increase - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Peanut+allergy+rate+of+increase&t=h_&ia=web