BREAKING NEWS: Karl Rove Indicted!!!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by K-Rock, May 13, 2006.

  1. K-Rock

    K-Rock

    Tomorrow is the BIG DAY???

    The following is another source:

    May 17, 2006 -- LATE EDITION -- WMR can report tonight on more details concerning the confusing reports regarding Karl Rove and Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald from last Friday. WMR can confirm that the appearance of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales before the Grand Jury at the US Federal Courthouse in Washington (in the new annex next to the old building) was a formality in which the jury informed the Attorney General of their decision to indict Karl Rove. That proceeding lasted for less than 30 minutes and took place shortly after noon. Gonzales's personal security detachment was present in the courthouse during the Grand Jury briefing. From the courthouse, Gonzales's motorcade proceeded directly down Constitution Avenue to the Department of Justice.

    According to sources within the Patton and Boggs law firm, Karl Rove was present at the law firm's building on M Street. WMR was told by a credible source that a Patton and Boggs attorney confirmed that Fitzgerald paid a visit to the law firm to inform Rove attorney Robert Luskin and Rove that an indictment would be returned by the Grand Jury against Rove. Contrary to other reports, some of which may have emanated from the Rove camp in order to create diversions and smokescreens, the meetings at Patton and Boggs did not last 15 hours nor was a 24-hour notice of intent to indict delivered to Rove. In the Scooter Libby case last October, after the Grand Jury decided to indict Libby on [CORRECTION: Wednesday October 19] and the Attorney General personally heard the decision the same day at a meeting with the jury, the actual indictment was issued Friday, October 28. Several sources have told WMR that an announcement concerning the indictment of Rove will be made on Friday, May 19 generally following the same scenario from October 28, 2005 -- the posting of the indictment on the Special Prosecutor's web site followed by a press conference at Main Justice.

    WMR was also told by a credible source that part of the reason for Fitzgerald's visit to Patton and Boggs was to inform Rove attorney Luskin that he has moved into the category of a "subject" of the special prosecutor's investigation as a result of a conversation with Time reporter Viveca Novak, in which Novak told Luskin that Rove was a source for Time's Matt Cooper. The special prosecutor, who has prosecuted one defense attorney in the Hollinger case, is reportedly investigating whether Luskin, as an officer of the court, may have violated laws on obstruction of justice.

    WMR has also discovered that last year Rove, realizing he remained a lightning rod in the CIA Leakgate scandal, made preliminary plans to move into the private sector from the White House to take political heat off the Bush administration. However, as it became clear that he was in over his head legally and his legal bills piled up, Rove decided to remain at the White House. UPDATED May 18, 2006

    WMR article from October 19, 2005:

    October 19, 2005 -- As of 3:45 pm, there was still no word on indictments coming out of the Grand Jury on Leakgate. But WMR can report the following: At approximately 4:45 pm, a motorcade consisting of a limousine, an SUV with well-armed security personnel, and a Washington, DC police car pulled into the annex of the E. Barrett Prettyman U.S. Courthouse on the 3rd Streetside of the courthouse complex on Constitution Avenue in Washington, DC. The occupants of the motorcade spent approximately 40 minutes inside the courthouse. There is speculation that the motorcade was that of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Sources familiar with the operations of special prosecutors are of the opinion that given the makeup of the motorcade, the time spent by the party in the courthouse, and the moving of the Grand Jury today to new quarters, the Grand Jury and Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald have concluded their deliberations and, as both a formality and a courtesy, Gonzales was invited to the courtroom to hear the indictments, have an opportunity to question the jurors, and be the first to convey the outcome of the secret proceedings to the White House.

    Although the Grand Jury has been meeting in the older Grand Jury room in the U.S. Courthouse, today it moved to a new Grand Jury room in the new courthouse annex.

    Two courtroom sketch artists were also permitted to sketch the empty Grand Jury room in the old courthouse building that was used until last week by the Leakgate Grand Jury. Last week, this room was used for the testimony of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove and New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

    http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
     
    #41     May 18, 2006
  2. TGregg

    TGregg

    HA HA HA HA, we was wrong before but we be right this time! What a bunch of libtards! Wait, can I write the next one?

    Bill and Ted's Most Excellent Website of Lies and Bait Shop
     
    #42     May 19, 2006
  3. Libtards?

    Which one are you?

    Beavis, or Butthead?

    <img src=http://www.terranova.net/content/images/beavis-butthead.jpg>

     
    #43     May 19, 2006
  4. fhl

    fhl

    Who repeated over and over that Rove was indicted? (right wingers?)
    My next question is do you believe it? (I'm trying to determine if you have a frontal lobe.:D
     
    #44     May 19, 2006
  5. Good question.

    Who is repeating over and over that Rove was indicted?

    Nobody....

    Thanks for helping to make my case, you know, about the frontal lobe....

    p.s. If you read this thread, my fist post was to suggest that the initial post was not confirmed by major press outlets....

    Doh!

     
    #45     May 19, 2006
  6. fhl

    fhl

    Nobody?
    Left wing websites were awash with it over the weekend. Maybe your rear lobe is gone, too.:D
     
    #46     May 19, 2006
  7. They kept repeating over and over that Rove had been indicted?

    If you say so, I don't read left wing websites....

    Maybe you could provide a link where left wing websites are saying over and over again that Rove was indicted....

     
    #47     May 19, 2006
  8. fhl

    fhl

    Why is a link necessary? THIS THREAD IS BASED ON A STORY FROM TRUTHOUT.ORG. sheesh! To come on this thread, with this particular subject, and state that right wingers repeat falsehoods over and over absolutely takes the cake.
    By the way, did you ever learn the difference between a journalist and a talk show host?:)
     
    #48     May 19, 2006
  9. TGregg

    TGregg

    Now you are calling the left dittoheads? That's pretty mean, even for you. It was the left saying over and over again that Rove was going to be indicted any minute now, LOL. Story after story after story, they never gave up on the fraud and the bozos on the left ate it up.

    It worked. They lied like a rug, over and over, and the left believed.

    Guess all the leftards need a new frontol lobe, according to you.

    :D :D :D
     
    #49     May 19, 2006
  10. Now you are calling the left dittoheads?

    Having reading comprehension issues, are you?

    That's pretty mean, even for you.

    Since I didn't call the left "dittoheads" your comments are a non sequitur.

    It was the left saying over and over again that Rove was going to be indicted any minute now, LOL.

    Who said it over and over?

    I saw a blog, then I saw that blog reference in some links, but I didn't see it over and over again.

    Of course, simply because you are claiming that it was said "over and over again" doesn't mean that it was actually said "over and over again" or that there was widespread hysteria.

    More non sequitur from you....

    Story after story after story, they never gave up on the fraud and the bozos on the left ate it up.

    As mentioned previously, no major media outlet represented the story as fact....but I suppose a few did take it as fact.

    Sort of like the claims of WMD, some idiot brain dead morons took that widespread hysteria as fact.....

    Oh yes, lets Google this story versus claims of WMD to see which is the more widespread hysteria....

    It worked. They lied like a rug, over and over, and the left believed.

    I didn't believe the story, and since you label me from the left, you reach an illogical conclusion....

    Seems to be a pattern for you.....this type of illogical all or nothing thinking....

    Guess all the leftards need a new frontol lobe, according to you.

    More all or nothing fallacy from the right wingers.....and of course the repeated non sequitur.

    The continual use of logical fallacy never seems to be ending with you, one just reads them repeated over and over and over and over and over again.....
     
    #50     May 19, 2006