commisso, you and i talked about this in private (before you left in a huff). the above is an attempt at an EXPLANATION. an explanation must make sense to OTHER PEOPLE, otherwise, it's not an explanation at all. now, if the monks weren't told how many of them had the disease, your above explanation fails. for you to then turn around and say well, " i got the right answer didn't I" is meaningless. the question posed was "how did they know they had the disease"? the only "right answer" to that question is to explain how they knew. if using your "right brain" helps you to conceptualise the problem and then come up with an ANSWER, great. BUT, without an explanation, the only use for your "right brain intuition" is for you to say "the monks just knew". which is no explanation at all.
Danny boy!!! AHAHAHAH This is bs, I DONT GET IT, WAH WAH WAH----> CALL THE WHAMBULANCE... what if you and i were on an island and someone came and said the one with the dot on their head must committ suicide??? Well all this time you have seen the dot on my head and I have seen on your head... If you wake on the 2nd day and see me then your fucked bro... thats the best left brain explination i got for ya sucker
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That is correct. Since the solution would be so trivial if he told them, let's just say he didn't tell them the number of diseased monks.
The only use? I got it! I knew the answer and that WAS the use, as for explaining it to you -- well like my boy ricky was fond of saying FOR WHO <----> FOR WHAT... Commisso is not here to break things down for your feeble mind Danny Boy
You are still not getting it danny boy, if all this time you knew i had the dot, when the visitor came you would have said ahhhh nice Te' is the one with the dot, he will have to kill himself, see you assumed you were in the clear and that i knew... but when you wake and im still here you know you are fucked, because if I didn't kill myself then I must have seen one on you and now your precious logic that you swear by would have it that we both have them!!!! Get it now danny??...
That is not true. Te' and I know. And we both know that we both know. And we both know that you don't know. But it seems like we can't explain it to you. Te' gave you a very good first step with his "island" scenario, I could take it from there and play the whole thing with three people, but since you seem to be having difficulties understanding the 2 people case, I don't want to rush you. Once you understand how it works with only one or two affected monks, then we can take the next step.
commisso, the question was "HOW did they know"? the only "correct" answer to that question is to explain HOW they knew. so, i ask you, on what basis can you possibly claim to "know the answer" when you haven't provided us with an explanation of how the monks knew?
jeeeeezus you guys are frustrating! you can CLAIM to know, and you may very well know. but an explanation actually explains so that others may know too. get it? Te' didn't give me anything with his example. if there's two people on the island and one has the disease, well DUH, you look at the other guy and he ain't got a dot so you know it's you. with THREE people, well, then you have no way of KNOWING, do you? and if you DO have a way of knowing, why not EXPLAIN to me what this way is? just claiming "i know how they can know" is no explanation. lobster, since i'm not into playing any childish games, if you really do know how the monks can know, now would be a good time to explain it. but please, stop patronising me with your "i don't wat to rush you" bullshit.