Brain science - 6 reasons science will not make you a better investor

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by OddTrader, May 28, 2013.

  1. Is it applicable to Venture Capitalists
     
    #11     Jun 2, 2013
  2. nitro

    nitro

    You know, while it may be true of the investor, all I see is continued increase in the leveling of the playing field for traders.

    Sorry, also I couldn't quite follow all the neuro blah blah comments either. Just ask Boggle?
     
    #12     Jun 2, 2013
  3. My guess is many New ideas/ things would be made possible in the financial markets industry!

    " The Predictors: How a Band of Maverick Physicists Used Chaos Theory to Trade Their Way to a Fortune on Wall Street [Paperback]
    Thomas A. Bass (Author)

    ...

    Excerpted in The New Yorker and hailed by the business press, The Predictors is destined to become a classic of its generation--an antic, subversive odyssey into a universe defined by the mystical convergence of physics and finance.

    How could a couple of rumpled physicists in sandals and Eat-the-Rich T-shirts, piling computers into an adobe house in Santa Fe, hope to take on the masters of the universe from Morgan Stanley? Doyne Farmer and Norman Packard may never have read The Wall Street Journal, but they happen to be among the founders of the new sciences of chaos and complexity. Who better to try to find order in the apparently unreasoned chaos of the global financial markets? Thomas A. Bass takes us inside their start-up company, following it from its inception as a motley collection of longhaired Ph.D.s to its passage into the centers of financial power, where "the predictors" find investors and finally go live with real money. The Predictors is a dizzying, often hilarious tale of genius and greed."

    http://www.salon.com/1999/10/14/bass/

    http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/reviews/parunak.html
     
    #13     Jun 2, 2013