boru's price action journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by boru, Feb 4, 2014.

  1. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    It's worth remembering for the "older" crowd that unless one is over at least 50, he's not going to remember a time when there was not the universal reliance on indicators. Or the ubiquitous candle. Those who learned by reading the tape have no problem with this. Those who learned with digital charts very often just don't get it. Which is the chief reason why I sometimes suggested observing a 5s chart (note the word "observing", which is distinct from "trading").

    But then some people do see it, and some is enough. If trading were easy, everybody would be doing it.
     
    #191     Mar 8, 2015
  2. boru

    boru

    I have been aware of this for some time which is why I always had at least two charts on my screen a factor of 3/1 -5-1 but whats different now is I know they are the same, I know this sounds stupid and I don't want to beat this to death but if I hadn't climbed off the hamster wheel and observed with no intent other than OBSERVE I don't think I would have noticed this. thanks
     
    #192     Mar 8, 2015
  3. boru

    boru

    I read mamis books and I got the failure thing right away it really stuck in my mind so when i'm watching this 5 min bar on Thursday i see the right tick spazzing out it goes up stops slows down drops goes back to the same spot stops slower and BAM I understood, I think its a failure I don't know if price is going down but I could sense a lack of intent on the buyers part. I need to go back and research this in replay can't see it on paper. To gears, not butting in at all, I appreciate everyones input as long as its positive and helpful, God knows I lurked enough threads over the years, hopefully someone will get this quicker than I did .
     
    #193     Mar 8, 2015
  4. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Well, I first became acquainted with W in '98. How long did it take me to realize that it was AMT?
     
    #194     Mar 8, 2015
  5. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    The "trick" here -- though it's really just planning -- is determining just how far away from this activity one's entry needs to be to avoid being caught in a false move but not so far away that one gets caught in the first retracement. Some avoid the whole problem by just taking it and saying the hell with it. But the fearful are incapable of doing that, and trying to do it anyway just creates more damage and sets them back even further.

    Therefore, one needs to do a little testing and find that sweet spot referred to in the first sentence above.
     
    #195     Mar 8, 2015
  6. boru

    boru

    yes the reactions will be larger on a 15 or 60 min chart so I thought I would chart the size of the reactions as long as price trends, then a pullback exceeding previous pullbacks and now you know you're outside the noise. am I seeing this correctly?
     
    #196     Mar 8, 2015
  7. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    #197     Mar 8, 2015
  8. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Well, not really. You need to see them move. For instance, in hindsight, the 1100 bar appears to be the only one that does not return to 4454 (or whatever it was). But there's really no way of knowing that without also looking at a much smaller interval. The 1045 bar, for example, may have left 4454 and never looked back. Or it may have spent 15m bobbing up and down and banging into 4454 and ending up at the end of the interval at the bar's "close". You could place your entry stop just below that bar, but then you'd be looking at a minimum 14pt stop, and are you prepared for that?

    A better bar would be the 1030, largely because it's acting as a springboard (remember those?). You would need to find out via "backtesting" if an entry N points below the low of that bar would result in an entry that would not back up on you and take you all the way back to 4454. And even if it did, your stop could be far smaller.

    So much of this has to do with fear. If one assesses the situation correctly and isn't afraid of it, he may just take the trade and the hell with it and not futz around with points this and points that and stops whatever. It's a matter of confidence, and it's hard to acquire that by dicking around with the minutiae of where do I enter and what should my stop be.

    Sorry, but the answers here aren't in the back of the book.
     
    #198     Mar 8, 2015
    damnpenguins and lajax like this.
  9. boru

    boru

    got it thanks, I put off the observation phase for years because I couldn't see the value in it, now I wonder what was I thinking.
     
    #199     Mar 8, 2015
  10. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    Actually successful trading is extremely easy. It's one of the easiest things I've ever done. What make it hard for a lot of traders is the over-analyzing of information, the need to be right and of course, under-capitalization. ---Rules should be simple--buy when things are rising, sell when things are dropping. Never risk more than 2% of TLNW on any one trade/idea. Let winners run. Learn to be wrong and be ok with it.
     
    #200     Mar 8, 2015