Border Patrol Agents Taught to "Run Away" and "Hide"

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by tomdavis, Jun 30, 2012.

  1. Border Patrol Agents Taught to "Run Away" and "Hide"

    Brandon Judd, president of Local 2544, the Tucson branch of the National Border Patrol Council

    In another nauseating series of "Virtual Learning Center" brainwashing courses that Border Patrol agents are forced to sit behind a computer for hours and endure, we are now taught in an "Active Shooter" course that if we encounter a shooter in a public place we are to "run away" and "hide". If we are cornered by such a shooter we are to (only as a last resort) become "aggressive" and "throw things" at him or her. We are then advised to "call law enforcement" and wait for their arrival (presumably, while more innocent victims are slaughtered). Shooting incidents cited in the course are Columbine, the Giffords shooting and the Virginia Tech shooting.

    These types of mandatory brainwashing courses and the idiocy that accompanies them are simply stunning when they are force-fed to law enforcement officers. Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that any three of the above shootings would have been stopped cold by an off-duty law enforcement officer or a law abiding citizen with a gun. The Fort Hood shooting would have been stopped cold by someone with a gun as well. The shooters in these situations depend on unarmed and scared victims. It gives them the power they seek. We could go on and on with examples of shootings that could have been stopped by someone with a firearm. One of the videos in this course actually shows a terrified female hiding behind a desk as an example of how to "hide" from some deranged shooter. Multiple quizzes throughout the course and a final test ensure repeatedly that we know that we only have three options when encountering some murderous thug in a public place. 1. Run away; 2. Hide; and 3. Only put up a fight as a last resort by acting aggressively and throwing things at the shooter. Not one mention anywhere of "if you are carrying a gun and you have the opportunity take the shooter out". Calling 911 in these instances is obvious, but we all know that waiting on the arrival of uniformed law enforcement will ensure more people are killed, injured, or taken hostage. Telling law enforcement officers that in all instances they are to run away and hide from some thug while innocent victims are butchered is simply inexcusable and pathetic.

    It is always comforting to know that for those of us who carry a weapon when we are off-duty, if we should encounter such a situation, stop a shooter and save countless lives, we can look forward to being disciplined or fired by the Border Patrol because we should have run away to hide and then maybe thrown objects at the deranged killer instead of taking action and stopping him with a firearm. This, in addition to the scrutiny and second-guessing that will come from local authorities and the inevitable possibility of lawsuits and criminal conviction.

    Welcome to the New Patrol.
  2. Stay tuned next week.......

    "How to find good hiding spots"

    ......and for gods sake if you must throw sumpin don't throw any of those cl light bulbs, they contain mercury and cause devasting damage inside a building.

    We should build a small border patrol memorial to dedicate to the people who did nothing.
  3. pspr


    That's the same thing they are telling the Democrat voters. :D
  4. In other words, the same advice given to airline passengers in a hijack situation, until Todd Beamer growled "Let's roll" and a bunch of brave men and women decided they weren't going to be slaughtered like livestock and let their plane be used as a weapon against defenseless people on the ground.
  5. gwb-trading


  6. Ricter


    Only because they had heard what was happening on the other planes. Up to that point, everyone was still thinking in the "skyjacking" paradigm. In other words, why risk getting cut when all that's going to happen is that you divert to some foreign city and get a great story to tell?
  7. JamesL


    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>