No, I really do not get any pleasure from giving anyone a hard time. I really felt that there was value in all the discoveries I tried to make possible for him. He doesn't percieve the purpose or value of work. I told the story. I put it into an inquiry framework. I waited. He did no thinking about anything. What is it like for a person to first discover the frequency relationship of volume and price? What is it like discovering the combinations of two things taken two at a time? This invents the trading cycle. Another person here is concentrating on calling me a liar over and over and over. It is his AGM*. Am I so unbelievable that this trader28 person cannot ever get over my my unbelievablility? It is amazing. Did you notice when he slipped from the South Pole to the North Pole? Recently, I mentioned Adm. Byrd and Lindbergh in the same sentence. Why couldn't he get reconnected with those clues? Three guys have just published. sould we have a thread on the composite they create for our times? If you want to see something funny, read Stiglitz's body language when Charlie Rose asked him if we were really going to go off a cliff? Stiglitz then crept back do the prior subject and amplified a little. (Krugman, Woodward, and Stiglitz). We DO have to invest in the new infrastructure and it would be good to compare assets and debts to find out the net worth of the US. In a prior infrastructure 70% of the work force did one thing; now it only takes 3%. I have immunity and will be spreading out my calendar months over three places: HI, AZ and ME. I want bariers on as many sides as possible all the time from here on out. I am beginning to think I will never be able to explain the operator combination of the four functions that are able to suppress ALL the "non-information input flow to the leading indicator of price for taking all of the offer of the market. In colorado a guy came up with a corn strategy (and system). We all viewed it. So the second in command at GFTI asked: "How can this system be adjusted to make more money?" I took the Q at face value. It was a training session. Weren't we all there to learn by some means or other. I felt the trainers had the first shot at showing how iterative refinement works. So I paused for 12 seconds and then stated a phrase. A phrase is a simple function that, by way of operators, can be attached to an integral system to solve a fundamental problem. So they got trapped as would themickey. I am finishing up my powerpoints for a GTM four day (during RTH) training session. As you see here, my opening remarks would make me a liar and no one can soak up the results of working since no one works. So ET has just become an entertainment center and no one who is serious comes here anymore. *Attention Getting Mechanism.
A shame. I keep hoping that someone who is serious will draw you out again for an orderly presentation of the intraday method. I doubt that you need me to gloss anything you said for the benefit of ET, but regarding "barriers on all sides" do you mean geographic, as in a possible SHTF scenario?
I count on coast lines and air systems primarily. In AZ getting to sparsely populated areas is cool but, then, you can't be on drug routes either. I couldn't get the SHTF comment. HI grows foods all the time. AZ uses greenhouses and evap cooling. ME is a lower quality greenhouse area plus the trapping breadth. Since my top knowledge bases are organic chem and SA, I feel I can make the proper investments in infrastructure change to support a small community in each place. Some of my books you did not mention were on stored energy from agriculture. That was why one title was "Fuel From Farms". Humorously, probably my Science Center and associated Wharton experience put me in the financial modelling seat for those chapters of that collaboration. I interviewed over 800 architects in the writing of the AIA publication (Again I was recruited by AIA staff); it presents the harmonious relationship of the built and natural environment. Each of the times I served at EOP were by invitation as well. Justice Douglas designated us as "The Green Mafia" because of our orientation to "Power to the People". Obviously we slipped the whole nine yards by congress and the Executive branch and, finally, the Justice system. So, the global situation went over a cliff. No one could lead in this infrastructural change.
Intraday was easy to build from the "scoring" and the "Pattern" that I juiced out in one simple post. Again by using finite math, the whole opportunity falls into place with one concept. I shows the four foundational principles and how they stemmed from one thing: granularity. There is just one drill to weave all the pieces together. I did laugh when you spelled out heuristic. Pete Peterson who was the CEO of Lehman Bros. siad the same thing at breakfast as the Links Club in NYC. His brother and a cattleman from Omaha were the ones discussing it. The alternative was "altruistic". I like that "Big Boy" in the freight yards in Omaha. The drill is another discovery drill that makes the Boolean choice really complete and hammered home. One sheet of paper and a mind set of RDBMS's. It is the suppression discovery which is required for doing the assemblage of the functions, operators and indicators. With a sheet of paper, eraser, and pencil, a person notes all the pairs of combinations of bars. A pair means 2 of each. A combo is a unique picture relative to other pictures. A child loves doing this. He doesn't know it leads to doubling your money every 4 days. we figured out no one in ET is going to do work. I'm sure someone will post the set of the combinations. For illustrating how the mind builds itself through drills, I made a module block that, by labelling, allows everything to be illustrated. It is attached
I misunderstood, interpreting "barriers" paranoidly wrt a shit-hits-the-fan scenario, which is my vision of the future. It is good that you are keeping your hand in encouraging sound ecological practices. And perhaps all the references you provided will keep your critics busy researching. I have made infrastructure changes over the years to support a small community of doves, cardinals, bluejays, sparrows, hummers, mockingbirds, bullsnakes, rabbits, 'possums, squirrels, raccoons and armadilloes. The hawks I did not count on.
And BPA is? I suspect that one reason you don't get a better reception here is that your mind is organized quite differently. What seems to be perfectly obvious to you drives others up the wall. Being happy with their own minds, they don't see any need to work to think like you do. I have been reading you for so long that it no longer bothers me in comparison to my pathetically simple approach. But I am encouraged that someone here will think to himself, "If Jack will dialogue patiently with the village idiot, perhaps he would talk to me, too."
Exactly the nature and how the shit hit the fan was deeply explained by Woodward, Krugman and Stiglitz. Since it happened and is irreversable all that is going on now is the "manifestation" for those who did not "get it". Each of the three guys is educated. Some with elegant theory. Others with the pragmatism of the heirarchy of money, power and information. All have portions of both. The intraday Holy Grail has a strange characteristic. As a trend goes forward, it sets up bands where the trend can end. And by discovering what happens before the first band is formed, you can fill in the table of all the possibilities and just what context creates them. All of the above is easily done using Boolean Algebra. So I did it. Transferring it to others is probably best done by handing it out. I had to find the existing location to place the functions, operators and indicators. wouldn't it be neat if you could annotate the solution and get the proprietory stuff to write out the functions, interconnect them with ooperators and get this system to signal with the built indicators? It funny, but it shows why Boehner wouldn't call Obama back. It also shows why Ryan's stuff doesn't work for Romney. So the election set up is all in place now. 1. PBS gets the fodder on the table for Biden to beat up Ryan. Obama just talks to the three audiences he needs to win and remains a "nice guy" to them. 2. Romney does his Big Bird follow up with the guys who can't get into the military academies the govt invested in. (VMI) 3. Romney jumps the gun at VMI by entitling his spiel "foreign Policy". Biden will let that stuff ride for Obama to smash to small pieces during the last debate. Obama plays nice guy and says he remembers Romney's foreign excursion that flopped. 4. The town hall after biden/Ryan will be when the public asks "Whats Up Doc". Secrets and specifics will remain untold. No one even knows we went over the cliff except Woodward, Krugman and Stiglitz. they will not be in the audience. Coomercial TV will run this show. 5. Three events later we have an election AFTER the globe fell off the cliff and it was irreversable. 6. No one has seen the existing balance sheet as it relates to the infrastructure change under way. 7. we could be having surpluses if the new infrastructure were built out. *. Cycles would have continued and they would be balanced as surpluses and deficits and on average a neutral balance was in place. So I do not care. No one is leading and no one is able to do work.
Patience. The fat lady has not sung yet. Strangely, I agree with you on this one: "As a trend goes forward, it sets up bands where the trend can end. And by discovering what happens before the first band is formed, you can fill in the table of all the possibilities and just what context creates them." With emphasis on the "can," because nothing is guaranteed. But if it "can't"... look out! (Boys and girls of ET, this could be YOU dialogueing with Jack. I am just an awkward extra waiting for my cue to exit the stage.)
I don't know what nothing Jack is doing that he can afford time from saving humanity from itself to talk to me, but I am bored stiff watching my codes run in real time while I try to streamline them to handle 10,000 trades per second without choking. I hate it when the market opens on a hot day and I see it five seconds later.