You started a new thread in Trading session. The way you justify your view has been wanting. and that's why concerned readers are furious. You should have created a new thread in ET Journal. And post your views in your journal. It is perfectly fine to have wrong silly crazy or whatever view or opinion in your Journal. Journal is meant for anyone (newbie trader , oldbie trader or whatever )
Glad you called me out. I do have some basis for my statement, it is not my opinion. I think your Boeing statistics included the recent 737 Max, mine excluded it. Excluding the Max: Boeing 737 - 0.06 https://www.forbes.com/sites/geoffw...t-is-the-safest-airplane-to-fly/#f2e12205c722 Have a happy holiday.
By the way, my reason for excluding the 737 Max is because none of us will be flying on the current version of 737 Max in the future, ever.
The source is exactly the same, Forbes just wrote an article with it. That's very conveniently only using Boeing 737-600/700/800/900 to get that number. I mean you can get all sorts of numbers by using subsets. There's really no difference in safety prior to the MAX disaster, the sample size is so small that a difference of 0.01 does not matter.
I agreement with you here, so let's call it a day. As a side note, I flew often and after the Indonesian crash, avoided flying the Max after doing some digging but I had no problem flying other Boeing or Airbus planes.
thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week: https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/faa-tells-boeing-not-yet.341322/
the market had a correction (not sure if it is a crash yet) because of the corvid-19 and uncertainty how it would affect the world economy when everyone is staying home and not going out shopping, to eat at restaurants, concerts, etc. so the market is using this as an excuse to sell off. not because of boeing.