LOL... Man groped by Lauren Boebert during frisky ‘Beetlejuice’ date owns gay-friendly bar that hosts drag shows https://nypost.com/2023/09/16/lauren-boeberts-new-man-owns-gay-friendly-bar-which-hosts-drag-shows/
Lauren Boebert Scandal GETS EVEN WORSE with New Camera Angle Surfacing Gallagher, a Democrat, was caught on video getting frisky with Boebert, apparently grabbing her breast while she appeared to rub his crotch as the pair took in a performance of “Beetlejuice” and the Buell Theater in Colorado. Boebert — who also has a long history of arrests — has staked herself as one of the most anti-LGBT members of Congress and a tough critics of children being exposed to drag entertainment. “Take your children to CHURCH, not drag bars,” she exclaimed on X, the website formerly known as Twitter, in June 2022. She has also attacked the use of drag queens for military recruiting. “I’m a Christian. So they may try to drive me to my knees, but that’s where I’m the strongest,” she offered in another declaration of piety from July 2020.
Maybe Boebert should go back to being an escort... Leading conservative women turn on 'embarrassing bimbo' Lauren Boebert after vaping and groping theater incident https://news.yahoo.com/leading-conservative-women-turn-embarrassing-141646856.html
I've been waiting for a response by those on the Right concerning this video characterized as "Security Footage" by the Left. Unfortunately, it seems critical thinking is not often practiced here. Some hints: 1. The "Security footage" has a narrow angle of view and is almost perfectly centered on Boebert and friend. Compare to how "Security footage" usually looks, such as ubiquitous police shows on TV. 2. The place where the show took place is almost certainly dark except for the stage, bringing into question how public the couples interaction really was. 3. The footage is extraordinarily high quality, especially given the apparent lighting conditions, further suggesting the camera involved was not a "security" camera. In fact, the camera is presumably a portable camera with such cutting edge capabilities it is associated with military and top law enforcement grade surveillance capability. This begs the question of whether it was appropriate or even legal to use such capability without a warrant. 4. The above apparent facts were not mentioned in the article, suggesting a political hit job rather than "merely reporting the news". 5. Was does the above level of surveillance suggest about the current state of our political system and personal freedoms in the Biden Administration?