Bloomberg special on Naked Short Selling

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by flytiger, Mar 13, 2007.


  1. Really?



    Ok, I'll tell you what.... I am going to indulge you on this.



    But only if you make a wager on this, in public right now in front of this board, and large enough that makes it worth my time, after all I don't sit around posting 3000 messages of trash talk and school-yard name calling.
     
    #191     Mar 20, 2007
  2. I just don't get what he's doing. I'm grateful, but I don't understand.

    I don't believe he has anybodies interest at heart but his own, I know Statutes have run out, but there is always disgourgement......... Why not just shut up?
     
    #192     Mar 20, 2007
  3. <object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4IZsQ7gLX1U"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4IZsQ7gLX1U" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
     
    #194     Mar 20, 2007
  4. http://www.dealbreaker.com/

    Brian Williams, However, Could Definitely Get Away With A Stunt Like This
    You’ve got to love Jim Cramer, whose car—we’re told—is a adorned with a pair of fuzzy dice and a great big “Fuck it, I do what I want” bumper sticker below the right tail light.* Aesthetic sensibilities aside, it’s this sociopathic belief that he can do or say anything he wants that may put Jimbo in some hot water with the SEC, CNBC and a few of his colleagues in the Englewood Cliffs cafeteria. Although we’re told that Cramer is actually not a CNBC employee --and thus perhaps not subject to all of the constraints that would come with working for CNBC-- it stands to reason that he must have some sort of a morality clause in his contract. Such a clause would likely say that he cannot publicly disparage a colleague (Bob Pisani) or, as someone close to the matter put it, “pissing on another reporter” is most likely a violation of his contract (and standard rules of decorum in the Western world). Jonathan Wald and Co. were also probably not so pleased with Sideshow Bob not even trying to pull a, “If I Did It,” this is how I did it deal but more of a “I Definitely Did It” and this is how.

    A few people also seem to believe that the SEC can make Cramer “give back ill-gotten gains,” especially since they apparently “hate him.” But Cramer seems to rest assured that his relationship with Eliot Spitzer, forged at Harvard, will protect him. At a lecture at the 92nd Street Y a few months back, Cramer told the audience that a reporter had called him to get dirt on the couple, and his response was “I’m never going to say anything bad about the Spitzers.” When pressed further for comment, Cramer asked him, “What do you need to know?” the answer apparently being “Something no one’s ever said about Shiva (Eliot’s wife).” Cramer offered, “She’s a knock-out.” That kind of street cred has got to count for something. Cramer also bragged about being tight with his former boss at Goldman Sachs, Jon Corzine, who he was neighbors with in Summit, New Jersey for more than several years. So it’s good to know he’s covered in both NY and NJ. He’s probably also only one or two working lunches with CT AG Blumenthal away from a tri-state area hat trick of immunity.

    Perhaps most shocking in all of this is the fact that at the time we’re putting up this post—2:01 p.m.—Hank Blodget has made no mention of Mr. Cramer on InternetOutsider.com. This can only mean one thing—he’s up to something.

    WHAT IS INTERESTING (CAPS TO DIFFERENTIATE MY POST FROM THE ABOVE) IS THAT CARNER USES SOCIOPATH. OTHER ADJ FOR HEDGIES ARE PSYCHOTIC, PATHOLOGICAL. HAVE THEY FINALLY GONE TOO FAR?
     
    #195     Mar 20, 2007
  5. Sheeesh calm down everybody. We are all (supposed to be) traders. When this gets enough publicity (and the truth ALWAYS eventually gets out), the SEC will be forced to start doing their jobs and enforcing the laws. The squeeze resulting from stocks with more than 100% of the float short will be unbelievable. The naked shorts are going to have to put up real $$$s to buy back phoney shares -- hopefully from some of us.
     
    #196     Mar 20, 2007

  6. Just as I thought, you are nothing but a trash-talking pretender who just lost all cred.

    I told him to bring it, put up or shut up, then the rat hid like a mouse.

    No suprise here.
     
    #197     Mar 20, 2007
  7. Bear Raid on Cramer.

    5:30 PM EDT Fox, "Is Cramer Manipulating theMarket."

    This is amazing. Like, out of the blue, they are raiding him like he raided stocks.

    I feel badly for him, like I felt badly for Hussein. Actually, Hussein took it like a man. Let's see how super mouth does.
     
    #198     Mar 20, 2007
  8. sorry but you come across like a little girl that bought a penny stock or two and wants them to make her rich. sorta weird how you neocons get all mad at certain dynamics. who knows.... don't get ur pannies in such a bunch.
     
    #199     Mar 20, 2007
  9. sprstpd

    sprstpd

    Does this mean his show will get cancelled? Pretty please?
     
    #200     Mar 20, 2007