those likes are mostly from a very small group of sock puppets. your douche to useful content ratio was setting internet records last year. I will note you have gotten a little better after your break but I bet you start reaching new highs in the next 105 days. QUOTE="Frederick Foresight, post: 4390927, member: 488296"]Sure, bro. And that would explain why I have more than half the "likes" you do even though my username's tenure is a small fraction of yours.[/QUOTE]
Freddie's latest moniker was created May of 2015, after the "like" system was established. My username was created 2009, 5 years before it was put into the site. And somehow that means his "like ratio" or whatever he calls it is better. Math is hard!
Snowflake "swings and misses" again. Last week, his proudest moment was his "nomination for moderator" in 2005.
Then how about arithmetic and the most basic of logic? Not that "likes" have any special meaning, but they negate your nonsensical claim that everyone here can't stand me. To you, "everyone" means, and is limited to, your insular groupthink squad.
Be willing to bet that most of those likes came from folks no longer here, which may lend credence to the belief that people most people here now can't stand you. It's just conversational, Freddie. Don't get your panties in a huff over snarky pics. I'm hoping you still hang out for a good beating every so often.