You may be on to something here. I essentially said the same thing to a good friend earlier as we discussed politics. No doubt, some (including myself) are wondering why he chose this road (it concerns me that he might just be another say-what-he-needs-to politician), but he seems to attract others from the other side in a way that hasn't been seen since Reagan (IMO). I still like what he sais about a lot of the issues, and am willing to listen a little more. I hope he's not kowtowing. FTR, I have no problem with ID voter laws. I think we need them, and if someone is against them, I must question their motives.
Gotta be leery with politicians but Rand seems one of the more honest ones. But honest doesn't win elections.
He may be honest, and I've always supported him, but I do NOT support his rolling over for blacks (dems), who wish to continue to cheat by no voter id, meaning "bring out yer' dead." Lol I'll remember what he did, and take it into consideration at the voting booth. Yes, unlike democrats, I point out when someone in my party fucks up.
Is changing your mind rolling over ? Maybe he saw the other side of the argument and softened his views. That happens a lot when you listen. There are a lot of gray areas to most political arguments.
No, he buckled to people who want to commit criminal acts called voting fraud. I don't appreciate his doing that, and I'll remember it.
+1 I have yet to hear a valid argument against voter ID laws but I've heard dozens of nonsensical ones from libturds.
So do you think he is pro-crime? (rhetorical only) No use getting too emotionally tied up in the vote, unless you're a billionaire you only have one vote and no say so in the turn out.
There is no legitimate argument against requiring a photo ID to vote. If democrats really think voters will be disenfranchised, then they should help get these people a photo ID.