Birthers Hail Judge’s Decision That Could “Depose” Obama

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mvector, Jan 4, 2012.

  1. stu

    stu

    You're quibbling about default again . What's the matter with you?

    You can't make a reasonable argument against the reality that no default was filed and another load of birther bullshit hit the deck in court.

    Those are the facts.
     
    #561     Feb 19, 2012
  2. jem

    jem

    your tiny troll brain is confusing default with entry of default or default judgment.

    Obama did not respond to the subpoenas after his motion to quash failed. Every moron with a brain understands that is a default, then plaintiffs requested a hearing instead of accepting the entry of default.
     
    #562     Feb 19, 2012
  3. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I don't understand how stuPID doesn't get this. I've never studied law and I get it.
     
    #563     Feb 19, 2012
  4. jem

    jem

    I am pretty sure stu is paid to be an ass. he argues with everyone using the same no substance troll tricks.

    My work is busy and I want to start trading more actively again.. less time for stu...so to save time I will put him on modified ignore. I will post the same thing as my last comment unless he presents links or proof.
     
    #564     Feb 19, 2012
  5. stu

    stu

    Well Crummy, you obviously get ignorant. Who would've guessed.
    There is no default if grounds given for default are not valid. Do you get that?

    Do you get this .....

    • "this Court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in Arkeny, he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen. " Micheal M. Malihi, Judge
    ...and this

    • "After careful consideration of Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi’s initial decision and all record evidence based on the criteria set forth in this process, I find that the Respondent, President Barack Obama, meets the State of Georgia’s eligibility requirements. President Barack Obama’s name shall remain on the Democratic Party’s 2012 Presidential Preference Primary ballot." Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp .
     
    #565     Feb 20, 2012
  6. stu

    stu

    Birthers filed suit.
    Response is required.
    Response comes in the form of a motion to quash.
    Rejected by the court.
    Judge in declining the motion rather than declaring default, invites defence to file a revised legal submission. Probably to give him ability to throw the case out in a way immune to appeal.
    There was no further response. Defense attorney decides , no more crazy interminable hoop jumping against the shit load of wacky birther demands.
    The Judge wants a hearing.
    Obama was not subpoenaed or ordered by Malihi to appear in court.
    Judge states in normal circumstances failure to participate further in any way will usually result in default judgement to the plaintiffs or, the wacky nutwing birthers as they are known.
    There was no default judgment.
    Despite no further legal reply from defense the Judge denies and orders against the plaintiff birthers.

    Where exactly "did not respond to the subpoenas" occur ?
    What "subpoenas after his motion to quash"... failed? Subpoena to appear? There wasn't one.
    The subpoena for HI to produce documents? They didn't. Did HI default ? duh. Was it subpoenas later rejected by the Judge maybe?!

    Or is this so called default of yours to do with one of the numerous Oily Titz birther subpoena forms sent out like confetti to everyone including Martians?


    The whole pathetic show was another in a very long line of car wrecks for Birtherstan. They lost hands down even when there was no in court defense submission against their same old dead beat hopeless claims, and you're trying to salvage some birther ground by hanging onto Black's law definition of 'default'.
    The best you've got is Obama chose to default because there was no default, except the one you, as a birther, decided happened. Brilliant!
     
    #566     Feb 20, 2012
  7. stu

    stu

    Would you really do that for me jem? Put me on modified ignore, whatever the hell that is. Thanks in advance.

    Everyone's an ass that doesn't go for the bullshit you blurt out. But let's hope your "work is busy" more than your rationality around here has ever been.

    Links or proof? ...don't make me laugh. I've tried that with you but like in other exchanges, to avoid proof you merely falsify context and meaning in links or facts you're given.
    Never mind, arguing through willful ignorance as you do, is bliss, so they say.
     
    #567     Feb 20, 2012
  8. pspr

    pspr

    Important words:

    “If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation, for through this in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”… George Washington

    “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”… Abraham Lincoln
     
    #568     Feb 20, 2012
  9. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Not your brand of it I don't.
     
    #569     Feb 20, 2012
  10. jem

    jem

    no change... therefore this is for stu.

     
    #570     Feb 20, 2012