I doubt you could accurately predict what the time will be in one hour. The problem with your particular lame birther idea is the only people who still want a birth certificate to be presented in Court under oath are the few conspiracy theorist birther loons such as yourself, who can't deal with the reality. There is no legitimate issue about a birth certificate. Get over it. Also Obama did not default. There was nothing to default in. That he did not respond other than to quash, is not without precedent nor is it surprising to anyonone who doesn't go about wearing foil hats. Personally I would have thought you should hope for a warped sense of the rule of law and patriotism. It would be a great improvement on the sense you have shown for both those things.
When his motion to quash was denied... Neither he, his lawyer, nor his evidence showed up at the hearing. That is a default. You are right not showing up is far from without precedent. That is why so many default judgments are entered by Courts. That you are so ignorant of the law, yet still choose to argue is stunning testimony to your character. A sign of intelligence is an awareness of one's own ignorance. You seem to be completely unaware of your ignorance.
"That is a default." Wrong, Mr Armchair Lawyer. That is not a default. It is only a default when the Judge orders it to be a default. The Judge will have advised the plaintiffs he was prepared to enter a default, however the plaintiffs wanted their day in court. Just like you, as a birther, said you wanted. So no default ordered and they got their moment, and it fell flat on its face. Because there is no legitimate claim, irrespective of default. So it is a fact, there actually was no default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs made. You were saying.... about your lack of awareness, your ignorance and....... intelligence...?
you are such a dipshit. I corrected you and ak pages ago and explained the judge stated in his decision ordinarily he would have granted a default judgment... but plaintiff's chose to have a hearing on the merits. I explained what a mistake plaintiff's lawyers made. Don't come back here and try to get out of your stupidity by changing this into a discussion about default judgments. We all know the facts. Obama chose to not show... but orly wanted to put on her circus --- therefore plaintiffs turned down a default judgment.
this is proof of your stupidity. Loon logic at its finest. So lets say Hugo Chavez has a son with Jane Fonda. You would not want to see if their son were eligible to be President? Luckily we have a constitution, rule of law and a court system.
You need to correct yourself. The Judge didn't grant a default judgment. You come back here in all your stupidity changing this into a discussion about default judgments, so you say it's me changing this into a discussion about default judgments. sheesh.. how do you get through a day? "We" all know the facts apart from you apparently. There was in fact, as I said, to all your stupidity in changing this into a discussion about default judgments, no default judgment.
Yes exactly you idiot. The Constitution and the law. There is a process in law for challenging eligibility. In law you need a true, proper and legitimate claim for it to succeed. That is what 'we' have. Constitution and law is what you as a birther like to demand, but don't follow. If despite all the law and process, a son of Hugo Chavez was first chosen by a major party ( I can't believe I'm even bothering with your fkng nonsense) and then able to be put forward as eligible for President LOL! , able to get past Electoral College and the rest, then quite honestly everyone would deserve exactly what they got. Especially you, being the dimwitted ignorant goof you always come across as. It can be seen why Obama's lawyer doesn't turn up in Court for this birther bullshit , it's simply too pathetic for words as you so well demonstrate.