Attorneys representing eight plaintiffs seeking to remove President Barack ObamaBarack Obama's name from Georgia's Super Tuesday Democratic Primary ballot on March 6 have until close of business today to file their briefs in the case heard before deputy administrative law judge Michael Malihi last week in Atlanta. [snip] Judge Malihi is expected to rule on this case by Friday of this week in order to give Secretary of State Kemp sufficient time to review his findings and issue an order approving or rejecting the Democratic Party of Georgia's primary ballot. http://www.allvoices.com/contribute...-due-today-in-obamas-georgia-eligibility-case By Cindy Simpson When the hearing ended, the media in attendance almost literally pounced on Taitz. Irion and Hatfield and their clients had left the premises earlier, while Taitz was still presenting her case; however, Irion asserted to me that not one member of the press stopped them on their way out. Doubtless the media did not want to discuss the law -- they'd rather write their usual stories on the birth certificate and interview the one they've dubbed the "birther queen." Attorney Taitz handled herself well, even though the press taunted her with rudeness and leading questions she has doubtless experienced many times. After the reporters finished letting Taitz feel the full extent of their contempt for both her and the entire morning's event, they packed up to leave. I walked up to one particular reporter from one of the prominent mainstream entities, noting that he seemed frustrated that he didn't get a clear answer from Taitz to one of his questions, and I informed him that I did know the exact answer, if he'd like to hear more about it. He said no, he didn't. I asked then, wasn't he a reporter, and why did he ask the question if he didn't want the answer? And as I was speaking, he turned and walked away from me. The same thing happened with another reporter from another major network. He had asked Taitz why no one cared that there were past presidents who had fathers not born in the country. I explained to him that it was not the place of birth of the presidents' fathers that was the issue, but rather the status of their citizenship at the time of their sons' births. The reporter scoffed and told me that that was just my opinion, but when I attempted to inform him that it was also the opinion of the Supreme Court, he turned and walked away from me while I was in mid-sentence. Does this behavior seem familiar? Even though I saw reporters from every major network on the scene, the actual reporting of the event was scant -- primarily only in blogs or local news. Google "Georgia Ballot Challenge" and note the non-mainstream coverage of the event. Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012...ia_ballot_eligibility_case.html#ixzz1l9SrH5hx
Out of respect for your experience as a black guy I will not call you names. But, implicitly, calling me a racist is bullshit. It also indicates you have no desire to debate topics on their merits.
There is something new here. The first article says Obama's counsel did participate in the process, but not at the hearing. If that is true maybe obama did proffer evidence - then court's finding may actually include a review of the evidence from both sides.
Thats right Jem . . . . there's no ' if thats true ' abt it. Remember that jack-ass who said ''Dont appear in court at your own peril'' and those who were hoping that the President will be found in Contempt and thus ineligible? Well all their hopes have changed, big time. All their hopes that the Judge will hear only their argument and rule in their favour is now crushed . What can i say, i hate to be the bearer of all the bad news, i apologize . .
In fairness, I got those snippets from a very left leaning website which had quite a few opinionated statements in the article and possibly some factual inaccuracies. But, according to a post on the Orly Taitz website Obama's attorney Jablonsky did attach a birth certificate to the letter he sent to the court on 1/25/2012. Orly has been given permission by Judge Malihi to try to subpoena a copy from the State of Hawaii for validation.
Why are the lefties still spinning. The hearing happened. The judge will rule. Note... That "jackass"... is the guy who will act on the judges findings. He has the final word in Georgia on who gets on the ballot. (before an appeal) This is not bad news. We want the judge to rule on evidence. That is all we ask. Personally, I doubt the judge will allow a birth certificate into evidence without the proper foundation. But, we will see. I trust the legal process.