Birthers Hail Judge’s Decision That Could “Depose” Obama

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mvector, Jan 4, 2012.

  1. jem

    jem

    1. You are so ignorant on so many levels. Your distinctions manifest your ignorance in a comedic manner. They also distort the "record" of our exchanges. But... I will note... you seem to have no idea of how a court compels testimony.

    2. A "SUBPOENA to appear" is how a court frequently compels testimony. See that word... "subpoena". You have been so wrong, so many times .... you turned into a clown troll.

    3. you once again ducked the question... answer the question loon.
    you are using words you do not understand... and you are using them incorrectly.
     
    #391     Jan 31, 2012
  2. stu

    stu

    Read my last sentence in my previous post to you.
    Then go read Georgia Code.
    Idiot.
     
    #392     Jan 31, 2012
  3. jem

    jem

    why don't you give a quote from the georgia code.
    show us in the code where it says...

    "Quote from stu:

    ...
    Administrative law judges as Malihi is in this case , don't have the authority to compel testimony. That would take an order from the Superior Court. ..."
     
    #393     Jan 31, 2012
  4. stu

    stu

    Why don't you read it and then go f'ck yourself?
     
    #394     Jan 31, 2012
  5. jem

    jem

     
    #395     Jan 31, 2012
  6. stu

    stu

    You've managed to produce one single civil response. Apparently all it required was that you didn't say anything in it.
     
    #396     Feb 1, 2012
  7. How many on this thread are sitting with bated breath and crossed fingers looking skywards to The Great , with tears in their eyes . . . . '' Dear Lord Please make him ineligible '' ?
     
    #397     Feb 1, 2012
  8. Most.... it is the only way they can win, and they know it.
     
    #398     Feb 1, 2012
  9. Brass

    Brass

    Stu, rather than stewing over jem's endless nonsense, why not just let the fullness of time show him for the doof that he is? I admit I'd occasionally get taken in by the irresistible urge to set him straight, but it has never worked for me, and it has yet to ever work for you either, despite the considerable time you have invested in his education. He is a bottomless cup of daft.
     
    #399     Feb 1, 2012
  10. jem

    jem

    the old passive aggressive coward trick.

    why don't you show me where I have been incorrect.
    the fullness of time already vindicated my position.
    On ET in threads with optional 777 and stu I predicted we would get a hearing. You loons said never.
    I predicted obama would either produce proof or not show up. You loons laughed and pointed to a internet birth certificate.

    As an american we had our requested day in court. The decision is now in the courts/state body's hands. They system has reviewed the evidence of eligibility Obama wished to proffer. They system is now working.

    Oddly, we saw Obama offered no proof of his eligibility.
     
    #400     Feb 1, 2012