you manifest complete ignorance of the law. The cases were is dismissed because the court does not have jurisdiction or because the plaintiff is not the person to bring the suit or the suit was not timely etc... NBC was not applied or defined in any of those cases. Obama's eligibility facts or evidence were not reviewed. you stu are a troll moron.
This must drive you loons nuts. It looks like Obama is afraid to produce even his birth certificate... From... http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ VIA REGULAR MAIL & EMAIL Michael Jablonski 260 Brighton Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309 michael.jablonski@comcast.com RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings Dear Mr. Jablonski: I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (âOSAHâ) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will âsuspendâ participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5. As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of Stateâs Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning. In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril. I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Brian P. Kemp Georgia Secretary of State
For morons like Stu... this is called a review of evidence and law by a state official or court. "Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril."
Do you realize there is a hearing a few hours on this very subject? If Obama does not produce any records, he will likely not be on the Georgia ballot. Or, he could produce evidence for the first time to a state election official or court in Georgia. And for ignorant asswipes like Stu... this means the law has not been applied to date in Georgia, because so far Obama has produced no evidence of his eligibility for the State of Georgia to review.
So if just one record is produced, are we done? Or will he need to produce records supporting the first record? Testimony will suffice to support the second set of records, or will we need records and testimony to support the testimony (and record(s))? Edit: *smackhead*, I just bumped this thread again.
We will let the courts decide what records are deemed accepted into the record. Courts have hundreds of years of experience dealing with evidence... they are very good at it. Every lawyer knows the rules of evidence and how to proffer evidence. Every lawyer knows how to submit records of birth certificates and how to challenge them and how a court is likely to rule. For instance, it is unlikely the court would give much weight or even accept a pdf... floating around the internet. That might be proof for low IQ obama loons... but at the very least a court would want the party to swear that this record is his birth certificate.
will ya'll stop it! .... watching Jem oloon turn into an after birther when this court nonsense just turns into another non event will be more than enough already.
LOL I think it was Ricter that I rattled. Obama doesn't want to play his BC card until this gets to the appeals process. Then (and jem can weigh in on this) maybe the parties can only argue the BC part of the case and not the NBC part without a new challenge starts all over. That would be a big delay in getting an answer on the NBC question. Regardless, Obama doesn't want this to challenge to go forward to a resolutiion of law. Why? Why?