Every time you call people "Obama loons" when you've already, dishonestly as it turns out, stated this is not about President Obama, only shows your true colors as a birther and an idiot. "some for the two parent idea... some perhaps not... Yea well that's a great argument you don't have there then. There has never been any grounding ever in basic law back to the Constitution and before to include conditions about parents. It is obvious why not anyway, apart from it being wrong. The parents antecedence would sooner or later by some crazy birther probably , then get referred back to their parents ad infinitum, until no one is a natural born citizen. Then the Constitution will have the wrong words in it. As everything else is wrong that doesn't conform to your weird ideas, you might as well go the whole hog. You're a birther so you just don't think these things through. It's to be expected.
you are such a troll I just gave you evidence, from scholars and some cases and in response you write a clear lie. did you even read the evidence I presented for you... troll? Grounding? I have been explaining the clause has not been defined by the supreme court.... but if you want references from justices on the supreme court. An English-language translation of Emerich de Vattel's 1758 treatise The Law of Nations (original French title: Le Droit du gens), stating that "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country of parents who are citizens," was quoted in 1857 by Supreme Court justice Peter Vivian Daniel in a concurring opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford,[17] as well as by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in 1898 in his dissenting opinion in United States v. Wong Kim Ark.[18]
Thanks for the education on this issue, jem. It seems the courts would really not like to deal with this issue. Maybe they are afraid of the consequences on previous presidential actions where the president was deemed ineligible after the fact.
As I posted on the other thread... It seems Orly taitz is sending out those pesky subpoena's for birth and immigration records. In CA we usually do not get the judge to sign the subpoena. But the image seems to show the judge signed them. We know obama's team will move to quash... This is going to be interesting. This could mean the constitution will be served. Right now in Georgia. http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30273 I wonder if the court itself issued a subpoena to the state of Hawaii? -- No big deal... this will be like filling out a scorecard. No problems, no issues. Obama will sail through this according to you loons right?
Seeing how 'Oily Tazer', the commie born subpoena monkey, is not bothered about publically making an utter twat of herself, there is obviously no reason why you should worry either .
I like the quotes on Orly's website When the people fear their government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. -- Thomas Jefferson During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
its already gone where it needs to go. (it looks that way anyway) If those subpoenas are real, just the fact that court ordered subpoenas went out, is a victory for justice. We will see if Obama plays games.. or produces proof of eligibility. if Obama plays games... it will not look good for democrat truth and justice.