G_d have mercy on your ignorant ass. Federal courts are extremely diligent and really only hear cases of true import, for the most part, otherwise federal court judges are far more likely to grant summary judgment and dismiss a case early on in the process than their state court counterparts. The above holds doubly for federal courts of appeals.
From a previous post with the court ruling, orly, yarly -------------- First, Plaintiffâs challenge to her deployment order is frivolous. She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Instead, she uses her Complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the President is âan illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.â (Compl. ¶ 21.) She continues with bare, conclusory allegations that the President is âan alien, possibly even an unnaturalized or even an unadmitted illegal alien . . . without so much as lawful residency in the United States.â (Id. ¶ 26.) Then, implying that the President is either awandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President âmight have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President.â (Id. ¶ 110 (emphasis added).) Acknowledging the existence of a document that shows the President was born in Hawaii, Plaintiff alleges that the document âcannot be verified as genuine, and should be presumed fraudulent.â (Id. ¶ 113 (emphasis added).) In further support of her claim, Plaintiff relies upon âthe general opinion in the rest of the worldâ that âBarack Hussein Obama has, in essence, slipped through the guardrails to become President.â (Id. ¶ 128.) Moreover, as though the âgeneral opinion in the rest of the worldâ were not enough, Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that according to an âAOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.â (Id. ¶ 154.) Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his ânatural bornâ status. (Id. ¶¶ 136-138, 148.) Thus, Plaintiffâs counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to âprove his innocenceâ to âchargesâ that are based upon conjecture and speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly âprotect and preserveâ those very principles. ------- Gotta love the wandering nomad part.
Agree. ALL of this issue could have been put to bed by Obama not stonewalling requests for documents... not only on his eligibility for president, but other information about him. These issues continue, obviously, because satisfactory disclosure has NOT been made. Makes one think the judge got orders from "higher up"...
Bullshit. This is akin to hostage taking. You start down this road, negotiating as it were, it opens up everyone to endless verifications of this document, and more. If every credible source is going to be discredited by the belief, driven by your ideology, that someone "higher up" is in fact controlling the outcome, then where does it stop? God? Or does it stop when you get the result you, personally, want?
Sure Obama could bend to the will of people like you... Or not... Odd, the right wing is big on tough leadership who refuses to negotiate with terrorists, but when it comes to that crazy bitch Orly and her followers, Obama should do what they say, simply because they say so?
I'd be careful about calling others ignorant. You obviously know next to nothing about the court system. Most federal district judges spend the vast majority of their time dealing with criminal cases, courtesy of the War on Drugs, not "cases of true import." Why the need to be rude about a subject on which you are clueless?
It amazes me that people with a pulse - can believe that Obama has presented evidence on this subject. The birth announcements were admitted forgeries. What has Obama presented. He has not proffered shit on this subject. Obamaloons are proving to be far less intelligent than the people they criticize. if you do not believe me... tell me where he was born and how you know that for a fact?