'Birth tourism' a tiny portion of immigrant babies

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Banjo, Sep 3, 2010.

  1. Banjo


  2. In Sweden, at least one parent must be a Swedish citizen for a newborn child to receive citizenship. Should be the same or even more conditional in the US... considering the "social benefits" an anchor child is "entitled" to. :mad: :mad:

    OK, I'm ready for the "you're a racist" responses.

    Just keep in mind, I'm from the school of "You are entitled to exactly what you earn for yourself, not one iota more"... That is, "the world doesn't owe you a living", and "make your own way in the world or perish".

    American society, generous as it is, does not benefit from those who abuse our generosity, government tit-suckers, nor other parasites on our already strained social support system. :mad: :mad:
  3. No, you are not necessarily a racist for suggesting a change to the law. But one wonders why you don't hear more about these anti-immigrant rhetoric when economic times were good and the immigrants were perhaps of fairer skin color.
  4. Shagi


    What the heck does it matter. You are all fucking illegal immigrants, whites, blacks, jews, japanese, chinese, blue, yellow or yella. Go back to your fucking native countries and stop bitching about who is legal or not.

    Whose fucking laws says the mexican brownie is illegal - white man, well fuck him too casue a whitey is fucking illegal too and it doesn't matter if you are 20th born generation!!