BioComp Dakota with Swamp Technology

Discussion in 'Trading Software' started by chifai2, May 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Fri Feb 13, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Fri Feb 13, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 836.00

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $6,322.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #351     Feb 12, 2009
  2. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Mon Feb 16, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Mon Feb 16, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 836.00

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $6,322.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #352     Feb 16, 2009
  3. James,

    Ever get that US trading calendar going? Markets here are closed today. :)

    Of course, the futures market is open its normal weird Monday-holiday hours, but I don't think that's what you intended, is it?

    Or is it?

    Thanks.
     
    #353     Feb 16, 2009
  4. jalsck

    jalsck

    Guilty as charged. I tend to get engrossed in the research and development.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #354     Feb 17, 2009
  5. Not a problem... I think you have your priorities right. :)
     
    #355     Feb 17, 2009
  6. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Tue Feb 17, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Tue Feb 17, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 836.00

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $6,322.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #356     Feb 18, 2009
  7. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Fri Feb 20, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions for Fri Feb 20, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 836.00

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $6,322.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #357     Feb 20, 2009
  8. Humpy

    Humpy

    Have to do something about these big drawdowns imho James

    Currently at over 50 S&P points again ?

    How does your system look with a 10 point stop ?

    Just my observation but if Biocomp was more helpful to struggling programmers developing better robots, then it would be beneficial to company and customers alike
     
    #358     Feb 20, 2009
  9. Hopefully James will reply, but in the meantime I will butt in and say that with these types of swing systems you are generally better off with either no stop or a very wide stop.

    I personally think that to trade futures with no stop at all is a bit crazy (although I know some successful traders do it), so I use a very wide stop. It is really only there in case of a 'disaster' type crash. (and even then, who knows how effective it will be?)

    This general point about stops not helping performance is addressed by Howard Bandy in his book "Quantitative Trading Systems", where he says "my research indicates that stops hurt all systems". (this is his conclusion, after several pages of analysis and discussion)

    Of course, if you are psychologically not willing to tolerate the large drawdowns (and I don't blame anyone who can't), then tighter stops may make sense for you. In that case you'd be trading some loss in performance for peace of mind, which might be a very profitable trade. :)
     
    #359     Feb 20, 2009
  10. Humpy

    Humpy

    It's certainly a very contentious area. Personally I swing between having tight stops to none at all and back again. Not very scientific !
     
    #360     Feb 20, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.