BioComp Dakota with Swamp Technology

Discussion in 'Trading Software' started by chifai2, May 19, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Mon Jan 12, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions for Mon Jan 12, 2009
    Buy 2 ESH9 MOC

    Open Position:
    Short 1 ESH9 @ 925.00

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $6,072.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #321     Jan 11, 2009
  2. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Tue Jan 13, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions for Tue Jan 13, 2009
    None

    Open Position:
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #322     Jan 12, 2009
  3. Nice trade, congrats!

    The system performance over the last 7 trades or so seems much better than previous. Did any system design parameters change in the last couple of months? More specifically, are you using the 3-swarm level system you discussed in your 10/31 post? I know it's developed and available, just wondering if you're using it for this thread's trades now.

    If I had to guess, I say yes, given the improved performance. In any case, keep up the good work!
     
    #323     Jan 13, 2009
  4. jalsck

    jalsck

    Thanks!

    The changes that have worked well are:

    - Wider parameter ranges for each bot.

    - All bots are using a flocking swarm adaptation algorithm (except for the new master system).

    - The second layer (10 meta-systems) of bots are based on a ScriptBot that selects which of the sub-system signals to use walking-forward based on their correlation to an adaptive target signal.

    You are right, I am using the 3 layered system. One of the benefits is that it is in the market closer to 100% of the time.

    Best Regards,

    James
     
    #324     Jan 13, 2009
  5. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Wed Jan 14, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Wed Jan 14, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #325     Jan 13, 2009
  6. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Fri Jan 16, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Fri Jan 16, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #326     Jan 16, 2009
  7. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Mon Jan 19, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Mon Jan 19, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #327     Jan 19, 2009
  8. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Tue Jan 20, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Tue Jan 20, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #328     Jan 19, 2009
  9. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Thu Jan 22, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Thu Jan 22, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #329     Jan 22, 2009
  10. jalsck

    jalsck

    Signal for Fri Jan 23, 2009 MOC:
    Long

    Trading Instructions Fri Jan 23, 2009
    None

    Open Position
    Long 1 ESH9 @ 868.50

    Closed Net Profit / Loss: $8,897.50

    Note: ($amount) indicates a loss.

    Hypothetical trading history is attached.

    Kind Regards,

    James
     
    #330     Jan 23, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.