Agree about investigating all. But for starters all presidential candidates in recent history released income taxes and Trump refused. We all still waiting for the audit to finish. He should be the first on the list, followed by all other big figures.
BTW your boy dumb frog keeps telling us Barr,Durham,Horowitz,the AK federal prosecutor etc are going after the Dems.Cant seem to find anything though.
The video evidence is key. There needs to be full 24/7 security approved by both parties watching over the evidence. The scandal extends well beyond sex trafficking and some unpalatable deals will need to be made. Epstein and Bill Clinton might be considered “loose ends” at this point, if I am correctly appreciating the potential scale of this scandal. I do not believe Barr is there to protect Trump. In fact, it may be quite the opposite. Excuse me for not being more specific, but a lot of information needs to be vetted. The puzzle pieces of what has been driving the inner workings of American Politics and major political events for over sixty years appear to be on the table now.
Per usual, trumpers trying to justify electing a suspected pedophile to lead them. Told ya Putin had more than just a pee tape.
Not gonna get Acosta out after his statements explaining things. Not asking whether you tards agree with his explanation- your script from media matters says you are not allowed to agree. So, the question arises, how much interest do all the dems now have in these poor victims if it will not lead to Acosta's removal? Answer: None. Or just keep recycling the accusations against Acosta. So, I guess the more advanced question is: How much interest do the dems have in pursuing media interest in a case that will lead to renewed scrutiny of Bubba, if they dont think they are going to bag Acosta? Here is a message for the tards: Keep the old adage in mind: "Be careful about throwing mud because you may miss your target and end out with mud on your hands." You may miss bringing Acosta down but end out putting more mud on Tard Village, ie. Bubba.
Hey Tree, you seem to have lost you way to the Horowitz thread. You ok? Want a blankie? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/ig-russia-investigation-steele.html
Just curious. I admit to not following this thread all that closely, but who is defending those guilty or those who are supposedly guilty of pedophilia? Which posters?
@AAAintheBeltway , @TreeFrogTrader @CaptainObvious . Defending Acosta's handling of the Florida case. My guess is that they like to boink little kids. I don't defend people who protect those involved in sex trafficking of minors. My opinion is that neither should you.
I'd never. In fact, from what I've read, letting Epstein off easy in Florida was a colossal blunder in the very best of circumstance, and downright corrupt in the worst. But I also admit to not knowing the facts fully. I was just curious who you saw as defending them. I didn't see the posts that did.