You are referring to Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, a member of the British Royal Family. a/k/a RANDY ANDY. At the clear risk of being repetitive, I will say again that much of this has been well known and documented so it is not so much a matter of uncovering crimes and getting evidence but a matter of figuring out why the fuck you have not done anything with what you already have/had. In regard to Randy Andy, for example, years ago one of the girls on Pedo Island made allegations against him and named the days he arrived and left, and it turned out that the flight logs totally confirmed her statements. In regard to Clinton,some of the girls testified that they were informed that they were told that high level American and British officials would be arriving off and on and that they were expected to put out, and they allegedly stated that they saw Clinton there but that they were not the ones to have sex with him if that happened. So that is where more work is needed. I am in favor of keeping things simple though before getting too deep in the weeds on more investigation on the island and let first things be first. To wit, Bill Clinton has absolutely, positively stated that he has NEVER been to the island. Fine. Let's get the logs out again, and interview the pilots involved- the logs if true indicate that there was more than one pilot over time- and see if they made those entries and recall transporting a former U.S. President. Let me give ya a preview of coming events: Bill Clinton's health has suddenly declined to the point where his memory has failed completely. And some of those pilots may have already been Arkancided.
The problem with hate is that it blinds the hater. During the 1980s Trump was asked if he would run for president - he said no, but the idea surely resonated with him. Do you really think that if someone knows that they can be president someday, that they will do something so blatantly illegal? WAPO hired 26 reporters to look for Trump dirt and all they got is that he said he grabbed pussy with the hand. Big deal. The guy is most likely squeaky clean and TDS liberals can't accept that as a possibility. Unsuccessful attacks on him only make him look better to his followers. You guys should look for something else, like having politically moderate candidates for 2020 with sensible ideas., but that would be too much to ask. Orange man bad is all a hate fest liberals can't seem to get enough of.
Ahhh yes. but they all have hope and faith. I think that in their lefty-revised version of Leviticus it says " And ye shall go forth and prosper, and hope and faith shall spring forth anew, and rain glory down upon you, and ye shall have new fields to plow and you shall bear much good fruit if you can just get Trump's fucking tax returns." I could be wrong.
We can work on our candidates while The New York AG,New York DA and SDNY continue thier investigations. Who cares if Trump looks better to his followers,they are the minority.He still hasn't had a 50 % approval rating. As far as Trump being stupid enough to break the law he did that during the Mueller investigation.Barr cant save him from SDNY and The New York AG and New York DA though
he is an asshole as he was before and nothing about him is squeaky clean. what has changed is how morally bankrupt the party of Jesus fucking Christ has become. his supporters are so full of hatred and pettiness with having a minority president for 8 years that they gave up on all of their principles and chose a president like the Orange man.
A thorough investigation is needed for ALL parties involved. An investigation applied equally to ALL. None of this, we'll take a look from 40,000 feet and some, and put others under a microscope. Nope, that won't do, otherwise it's the old double standard again. Homie don't play dat. While we're at it, we might as well do the same thorough investigation into every single presidential candidate. After all, they are running for the highest office in the land. The people deserve to know, right? Would recommend the same thorough investigation into every member of congress, but we would not want to empty out D.C. in one fell swoop now would we. Kind of a waste of money and time since we already know what those 535 scumbags are made of.
Quite so. As I said, back in the 2016 campaign I asked why no reporter asked Hillary if she had knowledge of Bubba going to the Island and this- as the script required- was summarily dismissed as just some Breitbart hallucination. Not so. If Bubba has been doing sketchy and dodgy stuff and Hillary were elected, it means that the country was at risk of having to deal with it all while she was in office. On the other hand, if they had just fessed up to his going there- if true- and nothing could be proven and she was still elected, then she would have been justified in saying "the people addressed it in the campaign and knew that when they voted." Oh, and please Lefterrhoids, do not gimme the "even if it were true, it was Bubba and not Hillary who was the candidate" routine. Hillary's origins and foundations as a candidate are an extension of Bubba's legacy and voters are entitled to inquire into the moral foundations or lack thereof and/or criminal pedo behaviors when she and Bubba play on the same team. But...but..but, whatabout Trump? Yeh well. What about him? The media has not sat upon many dicey scenarios with him, have they?