I have to agree. If Soros can throw away that kind of money to undermine Bush, what is the point of limiting anyone's right to contribute or spend money? The Democrats have a history of abusing the election finance laws, even as they clamor for "reforms", which they then turn around and circumvent. But as with many things, the Republicans have only themselves to blame. They could have mounted aggressive prosecutions and reopened cases that had been whitewashed by the Reno Justice Department. Instead, they looked the other way. Now they will suffer the consequences.
AAA is the rightist counterpart to MSFE. The Nixon and Reagan administrations were beyond reproach. LOL. The Republican party is the party of choice for the white collar crook. "Kenny Boy" for President! Re: Soros. How can a billionaire be a socialist?
Soros better be careful....:eek: Too much of a threat to the cabal, and he will have an "accident":eek: Senator Wellstone was about to pull the plug on GW's war on Iraq bullshit and mysteriously had a plane crash one week before last congressional election.:eek: http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0211/S00013.htm Mr Soros watch out, whatcha gonna do when we come for ya? better take your moola and re-educate Victor... he needs it
LOL Man, everything you say, no matter, what the forum, has to be calling someone a hypocrite! he's a hypocrite she's a hypocrite hypo-hypo-crit-crit! ...like a broken record. FWIW, soros pays more in taxes in one year than you'll ever see in a lifetime, pal, so be careful who you call a hypocrite... I also have a problem with your abundant use of the word "our" in your post, as if the "our" is something that only belongs to bush-loving republicans. "Our" military didn't protect NYC from jack shit on 9/11, but "our" military did seem to work pretty goddamn well during the clinton era. "Our" military is not the tool of the neo-con oil industry. Face it, dude, Bush/Asscroft/Cheney/Rumsfelon have managed to turn many of the good things about the US to complete shit. Soros has an opinion and the cash to implement it. Thank god people like him and buffett are stepping up to the plate to PROTECT the country and the principles that have afforded them the extraordinary lives they have lived.
Why is it a socialist act to "get out the vote" in a "democratic" society? Even with Soros' donations don't the democrats still lag far behind the republicans in campaign financing? Have we all lost our minds? I could give a shit about democrat/republican... because they are relatively similiar when placed on the political spectrum. The decisions they make don't have my best interest in mind and never will, so go on and bicker about who's what... c'cause it don't make a hill a beans difference. all you need is love... because... you never give me your money, rlb
Excuse me, but I believe George Soros pays very very little in taxes. Most of his funds are offshore. He owes most of his vast fortune to the fact that he has been able to compound his wealth without the burden of taxes. As far as having an opinion. Yeah, we all have opinions, it's just when you have 5 billion dollars, suddenly your opinion is worth a lot more then mine. That is not a democracy my friend. Also, I like how George Soros doesn't even state who he wants to put into power. He just wants to get Bush out. Isn't that what we would call a vendetta? At least the state of California got 1.6 million people to sign a petition to get Gray Davis out of office. And now all it takes is one single guy with a lot of money to get Bush out of office? Come on man. Wake up. If we let this country get sold out to the highest bidder, you better be careful who that bidder is. You may not like him. Of course democrats know all about selling out. Wasn't it good old Billy boy Clinton that gave senior Chinese officials access to the White House in exchange for campaign contributions? LOL. How low can one sink? Apparently pretty low. I will be very Happy when Bush wins his re-election and Soros has to squirm his way back to the Cayman Islands where all his money is hidden. LOL.
HALLIBURTON. But the auction was rigged, there were no other bidders. The Quantum fund is an offshore entity. But the profits that Soros realizes personally are subject to taxation. No matter where those profits are generated. What's the 74, IQ?
False! There were seven bidders for that Haliburton contract. This information was provided at a sworn testimony by Rumsfield. Stop it with this Haliburton sh*t OK. It's getting really old. And no, the Quantum Fund is not taxed as an offshore entity. In fact, it was the same reason why LTCM had a massive offshore operation in the Cayman Islands. George Soros has a satellite office in NY but it is not a US company nor a US fund and is not subject to SEC reporting requirements. And look, nobody is making money on HAL stock. It is way off its high of 65 or so 4 years ago and most of the people who own the stock got killed. All that money does that goes to HAL for those contracts creates jobs. It doesn't go into the CEO's pocket you freaking moron. And good old Dick Cheney who happens to receive deferred compensation from HAL, is getting killed on the dive that stock took. Go back to your fantasy world will you with your republican conspiracies and all this other info you make up. Your fifteen minutes is up!
Here you go big guy! Game, set and match. http://www.twnside.org.sg/title/pok-cn.htm The transactions of offshore banks take place in the major financial centres and are routed by fax, phone or computer through these offshore banks. The Quantum Fund is registered in the Cayman Islands, but its employees show up for work in an office on Eighth Avenue in New York City. But since the Quantum Fund is registered in the Cayman Islands, it is not required to make reports to the Federal Reserve or to pay taxes on its earnings.
FWIW, HAL is not employing americans, from what i hear; they are paying iraqis shitty wages. and, ironically, a french company is the largest oil svces company in the world (HAL's #2) http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/958312.asp?cp1=1 from the above article, "Waxmanâs interest in Halliburton was ignited by a routine Army Corps of Engineers announcement in March reporting that the company had been awarded a no-bid contract, with a $7 billion limit, for putting out fires at Iraqi oil wells. Corps spokesmen justified the lack of competition on the grounds that the operation was part of a classified war plan and the Army did not have time to secure competitive bids for the work."