In Advaita there`s no God as an object.No subject-object relationships.There`s Absolute from which all grows,but there`s the hierarchy for sure.The Salvation is when you become Absolute.Ther`s no such thing in Christianity i think.
Something like that, yah. There's no God as an OTHER, nor at the top of a heirarchy. In Christianity, only Jesus is allowed to embody the teachings of the East (although they are not seen as eastern), and it is blasphemy to follow in his footsteps in every way possible, even though he was explicit: "Follow me". In the east, it's immediately clear that students are meant to become equal with the teacher, and finally, equal with God, so-to-speak, an attitude Jesus was noted for. Yes, salvation is when the Absolute, which briefly thought it was something else (something less) realizes and accepts what it always was.
That`s right.The hierarchy starts where there are two or more.No reason for hierarchy in the absolute. They say Jesus has studied eastern teachings somewhere in India, hence the part from 14 to 33 is missing.Might very well be, if still nowadays the vast majority cant get what the Absolute is and laugh when told he/she IS that absolute.
Yah Zoroastar had some beneficial advanced concepts to add to the conversation, perhaps older and for sure better than Judaism.
Yah gotta classify those years for national (Jewish) security reasons. Even without emerging evidence that Jesus did travel and learn, I don't know how it can be missed or ignored that he fits the mold of a quintessentially successful eastern guru. I mean, to be crucified without pain? Rise from the dead? Very successful indeed. But as the darkest theological spot on earth, I don't expect the Jews knew much about the far east, and those who profit from this, the modern Judeo-Christian can't care.
Some say Jesus wasnt crucified, but experienced so called "nirvikalpa samaddhi" and lived his life till 70 something and died and buried in Roza Bal, Kashmir. Modern churchs are entities no different to Starbucks or McDonalds
I have trusted sources that confirm the generally outlined scenario of a voluntary execution (painless), a traditional death scenario, a reviving of bodily appearance, and the eventual disappearance of the body (ability to disappear at will). My source says it was Pontius Pilate, who wanted to use him to terrorize the crowds showing up in Jerusalem from all over the world...just to show the Jews who is boss. Not the Sanhedren, nor Herod...nor is it believable that he would appear before the Sanhedren or before Herod, all in the same night, after hours, on the highest holiday of the year...only to be cast in front of Pilate in the morning to force Pilate to do something he didn't want to do. All of that, completely made up to force Jesus to appear as a sacrificial passover lamb, slain by the priests. A prime example how the story is Judaized. Any rational mind can look at the official story and see it doesn't make much more sense than 9/11. Rather, Pilate sent out officers to track him down, and finding a known associate, Judas, out drunk and looking for a prostitute, paid him to reveal a location.
I think he was made a sacrificial passover lamb way way after passing over. I didn`t see any enlightened christian, btw.they probably are, but haven`t heard or seen any. Christianity is just a set of rules how you should live and overwritten umpteenth of times bollox called the scriptures.
you are kidding? you have not shown that Jesus did not suffer. according to the scriptures... you are allowed to believe anything you wish and make up whatever you wish... but if you are going by what the bible tells us... he died on the cross... suffered incredible pain as a sacrifice for us and our sins.