Most people forgot in this thread, it is not that muscular women are ugly, just the curvy ones are preferred to them by most men. Different strokes for different blokes, we are discussing TASTE after all. As we know since the Romans: De gustibus non est disputandum, or de gustibus non disputandum est, is a Latin maxim meaning "In matters of taste, there can be no disputes" (literally "about tastes, it should not be disputed/discussed"). The phrase is commonly rendered in English as "There is no accounting for taste(s)." The implication is that everyone's personal preferences are merely subjective opinions that cannot be right or wrong, so they should never be argued about as if they were. Sometimes the phrase is expanded as De gustibus et coloribus... referring to tastes and colors. The saying is an ancient Roman adage.
I don't think the women in the video are best described as "muscular." I see them as supremely fit-looking. Natural musculature is attractive. Being over-muscled looks good on no one, male or female. But the same can be said about being under-muscled. Muscles give the body shape and separate us from skeletons and stick figures. The women in the video don't lack curves. And if they had a thin layer of fat added to their bodies, they'd look better even to you than their skin-on-far-on-bones counterparts. Because natural muscles add to the curves.
And you would be wrong, again. 5% body fat and extra muscles IS the definition of muscular, case closed. Now I am done with this debate. And I will put you on Ignore until the next year so I don't get tempted correcting you.
You guys need to see woman bodybuilding competitions if you think these woman are too muscular... they are fit and developed and thexthy but far from being too muscular...
It is hard to tell if this is a woman: It is easy to tell that this IS a woman: This case is now closed!