hey, loser, look at this https://www.bigmiketrading.com/feed...ing-aka-amp-global-clearing-6.html#post422682
In Civil matters, a dismissal with prejudice means that the plaintiff AMP is barred from filing another case on the same claim. Within legal civil procedure, prejudice is a loss or injury, and refers specifically to a formal determination against a claimed legal right or cause of action. (Black's Law Dictionary)
I stand corrected and my apologies to BM. Good to see that both parties can put this behind them and get on with their lives. I'm sure both would have acted differently with the benefit of hindsight. In the end, it is the lawyers who profit the most.
Big Mike's win is a win for freedom!! Or donuts, whichever comes first... Most people forget that the value of the website is created by you and me, not the owner. We are the content provider, they are just providing the platform for it. Without posters a website is just an empty space...
Sooner or later that disgusting nazi loser and scammer BM who surpresses any opposing view (most of the time by using his magic ban feature) will go down the drain together with his brainless bunch of teen sheep and market losers. Just be patient. It's just a matter of time. Someone who is hiding in Ecuador surely has a skeleton in his closet.
Have you already taken your pills today, little Mikey? You know, the higher than average dose that people like you require.
Oh we are cross posting now, yippie, one more win for transparency: Bigdog Mike on BMT: "AMP was banned a long time ago, years I believe, well before the post you mention took place." Alrighty, I guess they forgot to pay the protection money, I mean sponsorship. That fact doesn't really change the more important thing, you provided a sounding board against a company in a matter nobody had any insight and you didn't let them defend themselves. And the particular matter was contract obligations and the possible lack of payment, hardly trading related. So why let somebody badmouth somebody else in a non-trading matter? That is just not wise. Had it been about commissions or front running, that would have been a different matter, worthy of public discussion since it could have effected other posters. Now I appreciate the attention and your effort to be always right, but in this matter, morally you were wrong. And how come anybody who doesn't sign up for your point of view has to be working for your enemies? That is just prosecution complex, plain and simple... I know a decent shrink, if you need one....And I have to say, that you care about my opinion, that deeply touched my heart. Man, take your win, enjoy the sun and let other people have different and often valid POV other than yours.
Unfortunately, even tempered and rational moderation of what the AMP contractor was posting to begin with would have avoided all this nonsense. You can't call this a victory for freedom of speech when only one point of view is allowed to be published on your website. Only the lawyers win.
Because making such stupid accusations as he does over and over again is a tactic applied by effin losers. So what does it tell you? Simple⦠he hasn't won in reality. And why do you think is he hiding in South America? Do you think his poor dog Hans Strudelegger was just looking for a different region for taking a fine brown dump? BTW, little Mikey, isnt it funny that you care so much for this thread despite having "won". Perhaps it is because you are now even more broke than you were before.
I think so also. The line between opinion and libel can be a thin one. It was the contractor that should have been pursued. IANAL, but there must be some way to go to court and have something removed from a website after proving it was libel without suing the website. ( I do not think suing websites happens that often or Reddit and 4chan would in court constantly.) I have mixed feelings about this because I want free speech on the Internet, but I also do not want whoever can afford the best lawyer to control speech on the Internet.