Incorrect. Being covered with tats shows a person with poor judgement and lack of impulse control. How you present yourself to the outside world is within your control. If people reject that, its nobody's fault but your own. The case with people covered in tats and this clown that Biden picked is the same. They both are nothing more than attention seekers. An attention seeker is not someone who needs to be in charge of protecting nuclear waste.
I don't know what is more disturbing: 1- Joe Biden sniffing little girls hair 2- Joe Biden picking this weirdo for this job 3- Anyone who voted for Joe Biden
Nice one shithead, problem is you are about 4 years late with the story. Here is an update. The Stormy Daniels story went nowhere and Michael Avenatti, it turns out, is a scam artist and in prison.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. Just curious where your boundaries are. Do you have none at all? Because I'm betting you draw a line somewhere, don't you, Ricter. Your line may be a little (lot) more liberal, but you're still excluding someone at some range if you have a line at all. So then it just becomes a subjective discussion. Forget about tattoos. That's so 90's taboo. What about this guy in the OP? Would you have hired him dressed as that in the interview?
Sure. I won't hire married guys, because their wife might get pregnant and they'll be asking for time off.