You only say that to keep hope alive - the document says nothing about Joe receiving payments - your Republican clowns made that up just like the other clown who is unwilling to post any evidence. Show me the evidence, not hearsay.
The document relates to information from just one informant, who was told that Hunter and Joe both received five million, but was not in a position to inspect the banking records or the shell corporations detailed in the opening post. There is plenty of other evidence that the Committee is compiling to verify the allegations, while the FBI has been dragging its feet turning over the aforesaid document. Zero Hedge was out in front on this.
Joe Biden allegedly pocketed $5 million in Ukrainian bribery scheme Joe Biden allegedly received $US5 million from a Burisma executive while he was US vice-president, the same company his son Hunter was involved with, according to Fox News Digital. The report comes after an FBI-generated FD-1023 form alleges Joe Biden was involved in a bribery scheme under the Obama administration where he was paid money by a foreign country in exchange for US policy decisions. The FBI had originally refrained from confirming the existence of the document but have now given the House Oversight Committee access to review it for themselves. The bureau had been hesitant in doing so to protect the safety of its “highly credible” confidential source who has worked with the FBI for over 10 years. South Carolina Congresswoman Nancy Mace has now seen the form and said it’s “worse than has been reported so far”. “[There is] damning evidence the sitting president of the United States sold out his country in an ongoing bribery scheme,” Congresswoman Mace told Fox News Digital.
That's what I am asking, does the document actually say that the informant said Joe received 5 million? If he did, the document which by the way consists only of what the informant alleged is being contradicted by Fox News correspondent as saying "the document does not say Joe Biden received any payments" How can a document say both? Also Zero Hedge is a known propaganda unit, why can't you people post actual evidence instead of using a line of conspiratards?
Whole bunch of words, but no direct quote from the so called document. IT's WORSE but I won't tell you what it is exactly. DailyMail, FoxNews, ZeroHedge The great trio of journalism is on the case.
It probably says that the Burisma official said Joe received the five million. The final proof will come from examining the shell corporations and banking records.
It either says that or not, what's probably. If the final proof will come later, why are Republicans talking as if they already have the evidence?
It sounds like they do have the evidence and they're saving most of it for the hearings so it can be presented in an organized fashion.