Anyway, you just want to make a lot of threads and but actually engage with anything that pushed back on your argument to the point of saying that experts with superior qualifications and joint experience to Charles Murray lost you because they used the word toxic. If you are not really really really a racist, wait till NY_Hood tells you what he thinks.
Ermmmm... Now, I only have an IQ of 130 and that was probably on a good day years ago in school so could you explain what your thinking is different to what I described?
Qualities such as intelligence spring from individual genes and gene combinations (and environment), not race. Anyone who understands statistical distribution and has studied this field knows that no one race has an absolute monopoly on intelligence. Individual black IQs as high as 200 have been recorded. The medians and standard deviations vary between races because those important genes are not spread evenly throughout the world. Thus, race is not a fundamental determinant, but a repository of genetic patterns. Race gets brought up because of a divisive history and stays in the forefront because we don't have color blind policies in college admissions, etc. "Superior" is a value judgment. There are plenty of other important qualities besides intelligence. As Charles Murray points out:
Right, so because I have read The Bell Curve abet over two decades ago I knew that was not in it. It is from his 2020 book Google shows me. There is an old trick apparent by Murray, has a specific fallacy name. I'll remember it after I have my dinner. https://books.google.com.co/books?i...The chapters to come make that clear.&f=false
You don't know what projecting is really and that's another big juicy fallacy you are falling for there. He has tenure somewhere, he must be respected. Sure. Or do you mean hold the position he holds in the scientific racist community?
I'm wrong, Murray has no tenure, he just has a position at some private political think tank. Well we can all do that.
Murray studied history and political science, not actual science. Lacking credibility and qualification he had a partner who died BEFORE The Bell Curve was was published. Had Richard Herrnstein not been dying of lung cancer which he succombed to before the Bell Curve was released I feel confident Murray the political scientist would have got away with no peer review. Herrnstein was probably turning in his grave.