Joe is never going to appear so let's stop ruminating over fantasy. I don't understand all this false hope that this report is going to do this and this impeachment is going to do that. Both sides are delusional. Trump is not going to be tried by the Senate and Joe is not going to be called in to testify or accept it and Horowitz or whoever has no bombshell waiting. GOP is as castrated as Dems waiving around threats of hearings and you all swallow the full 8 inches.
No fantasy involved. Joe is in a no-win situation. The optics of not appearing and the resulting kerfluffle will create bountiful and joyous fodder and more unwanted attention for Joe. I mean Joe is guilty then right? Otherwise why would he not want to be transparent and help the process? Nope. Joe be in a pickle, your Debbie Downer comments being noted.
You need to stop obsessing about hearings and testimony and magical reports that will destroy the other side...it just aint gonna happen to either party. People really don't care. It is a fantasy.
Really? We just saw Joe disgracing himself in verbal altercation with a voter in Iowa over it. Lots of good publicity for the republicans coming out of it. And Joe running ads to defend himself against Trump when he has limited funds and is trying to compete in the primary. Nope. Your Debbie Downer routine not working today. Lots and lots more mileage out of this Joe and Hunter scenario. Not even remotely started yet. And did you not hear me, when I said that Joe not-appearing is a beautiful thing too? As Warren would say: "We have a plan for that."
That farmer would have body slammed Sleepy Joe. He looked like he played offensive line back in the day. Joe comes off as the asshole hiding behind the Secret Service while he insults citizens for having the temerity to question his actions.
Biden, the "moderate" democrat in the race, wants to ban 9 mill pistols, the single most owned firearm in the country. He is just as dangerous as Bloomberg. https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/26/joe-biden-wants-to-ban-9mm-pistols/?utm_source=Ammo.com+Newsletter+List&utm_campaign=ef43444124-AC_Newsletter_6-17-19_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_835c3fc179-ef43444124-323056025 A week after he told voters that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect “a magazine with a hundred clips in it,” 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidate Joe Biden offered supporters more of his singular brand of anti-gun nonsense. While attending a private campaign event in Seattle, the former vice president reportedly called for a ban on 9mm pistols. According to an article from the Seattle Times, Biden was in town to attend two private fundraisers, one of which was at the home of “a top Amazon executive.” The posh soiree set attendees back a princely $2,800 per-person. The other fundraiser was held at the home of a local philanthropist. That staider event offered donors a relative bargain with a $500 minimum price tag. While speaking to attendees of the latter event, Biden claimed that he supports the Second Amendment. The 77-year-old then went on to ask “Why should we allow people to have military-style weapons including pistols with 9mm bullets and can hold 10 or more rounds?” Biden also shared his tired and inaccurate claim that because there is a shot-shell restriction for migratory bird hunting, “We protect geese from Canada more than we do people.” In targeting 9mm pistols, Biden has called for a ban on one of the most popular firearms in America. According to ATF’s Firearms Commerce in the United States FY 2019, there were over 3.6 million pistols manufactured in the U.S. in 2017. This was more than 1 million more guns than the next most popular category of firearms, rifles. Further, over 3.2 million handguns (including revolvers) were imported in to the U.S. in 2017. In its annual report on the U.S. firearms industry, Shooting Industry reported that 9mm caliber pistols are the most commonly produced pistol and have been for many years. In 2017 alone, there were more than 1.7 million 9mm pistols produced in the U.S. Cumulatively there are tens of millions of 9mm pistols in the hands of law-abiding Americans. The 9mm pistol is the choice of the nation’s leading civilian law enforcement agency, the FBI. Moreover, 9mm pistols are used by countless other federal, state, and local civilian law enforcement agencies. Biden alluded to the 9mm handgun’s military applications, but these agencies are not tasked with waging war on the public, but rather defending the public. This defensive application is the same reason that millions of Americans have chosen a 9mm pistol as their self-defense firearm. The landmark Second Amendment U.S. Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller concerned a complete prohibition on the ownership of handguns in Washington, D.C. The opinion made clear that the Second Amendment at a minimum protects the right to acquire and possess firearms “in common use at the time” for lawful purposes such as self-defense. It is impossible to square Biden’s statement with the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Second Amendment. Many types of firearms, such as the AR-15, are “in common use” for lawful purposes like self-defense and therefore protected under the Second Amendment. The 9mm pistol is not just “in common use” for self-defense. As the production statistics indicate, it may be the most common firearm in use for self-defense. Therefore, it is not permissible under the Second Amendment for a jurisdiction to prohibit 9mm pistols. The law-abiding 9mm pistol-owning residents of the D.C., Chicago, and a handful of Chicago suburbs are a testament to this fact. Biden’s political career is an ongoing spectacle of anti-gun incompetence. However, his high-profile gaffes can serve an instructive purpose. Biden is emblematic of a political class that cannot be bothered to learn the most rudimentary information concerning firearms and the right to keep and bear arms. Despite nearly four decades in the U.S. Senate and eight years as vice president, he is still a complete ignoramus on the subject. Biden and his cohort don’t want to know anything about guns, gun rights, or gun owners. Rather, they prefer to mindlessly indulge their anti-gun prejudice at every opportunity. Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Click here to follow NRA-ILA on Facebook.
Joe walking into another flap and self-inflicted wound. Go for it Joe. If this scenario does not turn out to be a disaster, Joe's explaining it will. Always two chances to win with Joe. One is the actual mis-step that is fuck-up, and then if that is not so bad, he will fuck up the explanation of it leaving you to wonder what planet he is on. Biden ripped for hitting Iowa trail with Obama alum making $1M-a-year off dairy farmers https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...obama-alum-making-1m-a-year-off-dairy-farmers
Interesting that Camp CNN is criticizing- openly sweating about -Joe's Iowa/Hunter disaster, whereas most of the other lefty networks are trying to pretty it up by putting a medal on Joe's chest and saying that this demonstrates that Joe is the macho guy who can stand up to Trump and he is putting this Hunter thing to bed the way his supporters want him to. The lefties are like a family now where daddy has a drinking problem. Half of them are running around hiding the bottles for him, and the other half are trying to figure out what the hell they are going to do if this shiite does not end. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...reaction-to-voter-question-about-hunter-biden "He's going to have to have an answer to the question about his son," Jackie Kucinich, the Washington bureau chief for the Daily Beast, said Thursday on the network. "You can't get mad at every voter who asks that." The host of the CNN panel, Jim Sciutto, called the question "legitimate," and Gloria Borger, CNN's chief political analyst, said she agreed that the former vice president "has to have an answer" to questions about his son. ====