Bhutto murdered in Pakistan.

My word. Thats what you come up with? I spell badly.

You're spending too much time with (on?) the children

 

That's 100% contradictory to what muslims say when they move to western countries. They all say we need to adapt to their culture so they can install sharia law.

 

It doesn't really matter what Muslims, or Jews or anybody else for that matter, think what western countries should do about sharia law.
It's up to each country to uphold their own laws, such as they are. If a country wants to live by sharia law, and install that method of law, thats their business. If a country hates the whole idea of sharia law,and chooses some other form of law, thats good too. Keeping the beliefs inside their perspective boarders is where the problems start and end.

As far as the teacher, It's absurd to believe an educated westerner would not know of the unrest between Muslim nations and so-called Christian nations. Taunting the wrath of zealots when you're so far away from home, is...is... asinine.

 

You aren't getting the point.

Muslims come to the west and cry racism when they can't install Sharia law and we don't adapt to their culture but when it's the other way around. ie. the teacher naming a friggin teddy bear muhammed they go insane and call for a beheading.

 

“You aren't getting the point.” Perhaps not.

I think what you're saying is that Muslims want the world to adopt their beliefs and customs. I say, well of course they do. And so too Christians, want the same thing for the world.

I also think you're saying, that because the west lets Muslims come and have their say publicly, it's only fair to let the west go to their country and have our say publicly.

I'm saying that forcing and or intimidating other nations to adhere to another's sense of “fairness”, is not the moral high ground.

Before “fairness” can be achieved between two or more parties, they first need to decide on and agree on the meaning of the word RESPECT. Will respect mean “fear of” or “admiration of”? Only one meaning will lead to fairness.

 

This is so wrong. Here is the preamble of the UN declaration of human rights:

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Last I checked, Sudan is a member of the UN. In fact, it is a member of the UN human rights commission.

 

Wait a minute... I have chuck on ignore, but do not tell me that he came on here and said that the teacher had the choice to learn the laws of the country she was in and abide by them or leave. Do not tell me he said that.

If he said that he's just admitted that he is full of shit. He knows goddamn well that when Muslims come to other countries, the first thing they do is go to the government and tell them that they want to govern themselves by Sharia law. It is we non-Muslims who must accommodate them, and allow them to deal with criminal trespass in the way they see fit (which, by the way, includes hanging young people for flirting). They are not required, in their twisted way of thinking, to accept and abide by the laws of the country the have chosen. For example, they are not required to show their faces at polling stations because the hijab is their custom, even though it is the law in our country that everyone must do so.

chuck, you are completely and utterly full of shit if you actually came on here and suggested that the problem with the teacher was that she wasn't willing to abide by the laws of the country she was in. There is no way to describe how hypocritical that is.

The larger point is this - there are universal laws, laws which are dictated by the moral compass that is built into the hearts and minds of free thinking men. Notice I said free thinking. Free thought is the one thing that the Radical Muslims abhor.

To slice the genitals of a young female child, to bury a woman in sand up to her neck and stone her to death, to hang another teenager because she was talking with a married man, to shatter the bones of the hands of a young musician because he played Beatles songs on his dulcimer, to ostracize and ruin the family of a woman who finally had the guts to leave a stinking fat Muslim Radical who beat the shit out of her while piss drunk and raped her sister, to murder innocent people, total innocents, mothers and fathers and children, in Bali, New York, Madrid, and anywhere else where people congregate, these are crimes against humanity, the acts of butchers, the product of brainwashing at best.

We consider these acts crimes. The Radical Muslim thinks that if he carries out such acts, he will ascend to heaven and be fellated by 89 virgins.

End of story.

 

Are you saying that the western nations ought to exterminate the essence of sharia law? Or maybe there is no such thing as a sovereign nation?
Sorry, but I'm at a loss as to what your point is.

PS. dicknik, if you would like to hurl some more insults with me, thats fine. But please, stop being a coward and confront me face to face. Using human shields is so distasteful.

 

You talking about "moral high ground" and "respect" is like Khomeini talking about tolerance.

You're a moronic lozzzer. Accept your lot in life, and consider ending it.

 

Grow up already!

The world has had enough of your hate.