Beware - critical flaw in IB Ideal Pro

Discussion in 'Forex Brokers' started by TraderTony, Oct 4, 2006.

  1. ivob

    ivob

    Yeah I was pretty surprised by this. I know 25,000 is not a lof of volume but I was just testing how IDEALPRO works in anticipation of more volume. In fact you are screwed if you have a remainder of less than 25,000. Enough reason for me not to look further into IDEALPRO.

    Maybe a solution would be something like all-or-none order or no-partial-fills or immediate or cancel but I am not sure if such a thing exists on IDEALPRO. Anyone?

    regards,
    Ivo
     
    #101     Jan 25, 2007
  2. Please keep us informed about your experience anytime. TIA.
     
    #102     Jan 25, 2007
  3. cscott

    cscott

    That is EXACTLY how it works, and EXACTLY why IB is not a good place to trade forex.
     
    #103     Jan 25, 2007
  4. ddunbar

    ddunbar Guest

    IB is not a good place to trade SMALL sub-standard lots.

    Standard lot = $100,000 retail, $1,000,000 interbank.

    OANDA is best suited for small account or small order trading.
     
    #104     Jan 25, 2007
  5. ivob

    ivob

    Here's IB's reply:

    "You are correct in your assessment of the IDEALPRO/IDEAL systems. Unfortunately, this is one of the risks inherent in trading FOREX. At this point, you will need to use IDEAL to close the remainder of your trade. We are working to upgrade our systems, and hope that in the future, this can be avoided. Thank you. "

    Funny. First they say this is the risk of trading FOREX. Then they admit their system cannot handle this and they will upgrade in the future.... Also I think in Tradertony's case they did admit it was their fault.


    Imagine you have some automated orders or stop losses etc and you don't even notice.

    regards.
    Ivo
     
    #105     Jan 25, 2007
  6. they need an all-or-none option for forex trades on IB. it should be left to the user to decide if they want to take small lots at good prices or wait for enough liquidity to fill the whole order in one go.
     
    #106     Jan 25, 2007
  7. ddunbar

    ddunbar Guest

    That would be best. Or simply do away with the 25,000 minimum, raising it to the retail industry standard of 100,000.
     
    #107     Jan 25, 2007
  8. they should'nt impose a minimum lot size since many users use forex for hedging.
     
    #108     Jan 25, 2007
  9. notouch

    notouch

    Here's a thought. If you try to close 25,000 but get left with 10,000, why not open another 25,000 position and try to close with 35,000? That would be cheaper than using the silly 100 pip IDEAL spreads.
     
    #109     Jan 28, 2007
  10. cscott

    cscott

    I've had an account with Oanda for 2 years. I would like to close it and use my IB acct for everything, but I can't because of IB's forex flaws. I wish IB would get their forex act together.
     
    #110     Jan 29, 2007